I feel like the "made necessary by" bit needs a "say's who". But the bigger issue is that this page is entirely without the context of the framework's relation to the larger question of mobile approaches. Responsive design is the elephant in the room. Maybe a subsection devoted to comparing jQuery Mobile to media-query-driven responsive design which contains information about when each might be more appropriate would help out. It seems like at this date that responsive css is frequently more cost-effective than maintaining separate sites... but not always. It would be good to outline some of the use cases for when people find a separate site (driven by, for example, jQuery Mobile) of use. --188.8.131.52 (talk) 16:10, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Newbie question: I wanted to link the term Worklight to a future new entry on Worklight software (www.worklight.com). But the term Worklight is already taken by another entry. What do I do?
hyperbole, and then some
jQuery Mobile provides a powerful theming framework
Powerful journalism or factual encyclopedia? Let's choose.
Find an informative adjective for YAF (yet another framework) or drop it. Tap.
Of course, " made necessary by " the existence of rival technology is not the same as " made attractive by " the problem of doing apps for diverse hardware and operating systems.
Think of your surgeon explaining that this second procedure is made necessary by the mistakes of that first surgeon ... and you may see my point.
One good exercise is to listen to old footage of IBM extolling OS/2 while Microsoft extolled NT while who held the rights to unix ?
G. Robert Shiplett 22:06, 27 June 2012 (UTC)