Talk:James M. Buchanan
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
It's easier to demonstrate paternity when there isn't a forty-plus year gap between the death of the father than the birth of the child...
No, there's no relation between the president and the economist.
Fair use rationale for Image:Buchanan book.jpg
Image:Buchanan book.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|boilerplate page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 12:16, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Buchanan only a Macroeconomist???
The "Chicago School" template box inserted at the front of the article as of 2010-03-11 labels Buchanan as merely a "macroeconomist." This seems way too narrow. A large part of Buchanan's work dealt with micro behaviors--which of course lead to macro outcomes out of the endogenous process inside any complex adaptive system (I'm using some of 2005 Nobelist Thomas Schelling's terminology here.). Buchanan's foundational work in public choice was nearly completely microeconomic analysis on real people placed into political roles, whether of legislator, executive, or mere bureau-member at some lower level of the state entity. Of course, he also explained a lot of macro outcomes from this micro political behavior, especially for example in Democracy in Deficit or The Power to Tax or Politics as Public Choice. Does anyone have a source that would support the application of the singular macroeconomist label to Buchanan? N2e (talk) 11:21, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Chicago or Austrian
Does anyone have a source for the billing of James Buchanan as being part of the Chicago School of Economics, as he said:
- "I certainly have a great deal of affinity with Austrian economics and I have no objections to being called an Austrian. Hayek and Mises might consider me an Austrian but, surely some of the others would not."
He is also on record as not being in complete agreement with the newer members of the Chicago School, according to this source.
If there are other sources where either he identifies as part of the Chicago School, then perhaps this would be an appropriate topic to discuss within the article.