Talk:January 0

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 September 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

1900 date format[edit]

Please explain the "1900 date format". Is it something unique to Microsoft? — Joe Kress 19:40, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have a related query. It says currently: In Microsoft Excel, the day 0 of the 1900 date format is January 0, 1900. However, as the fact that 1900 was not a leap year in the Gregorian calendar is ignored, it actually corresponds to 30 December 1899.

Q.1 Why doesn't it correspond to 31 December 1899, being the day preceding 1 January 1900?
Q.2 What does this have to do with leap years? Leap years only make their mark on 29 February, ie. 29 February 1900 in this case. How could this possibly affect dates in the preceding December/January? JackofOz 00:32, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Answers 1 and 2: The article was wrong. It has nothing to do with leap years so I removed the However sentence. To clarify I included quotes from the Microsoft cite.-Wikianon (talk) 01:14, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for deletion[edit]

I have nominated this for deletion, for the reasons stated on the relevant deletion discussion page. Tilefish 16:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The result was Keep but the nomination prompted several people to improve the article and justify its existence, the job's a good'un. Tilefish 21:35, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DONT DELETE[edit]

Don delete this its a real thing and therefore should be added to the Wikipedia database —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.59.25.130 (talk) 12:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft Excel question[edit]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on January 0. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/666iH0vl1?url=http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/leapsec.html to http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/leapsec.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]