Talk:Jason Charles

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Untitled[edit]

As it presently stands, this page surely does not meet wikipedia's standards of objectivity. To give a better idea of the quality of this author's work the page needs to include references to reviews from respected, mainstream theatre critics.

I have added a critical reaction section, but someone keeps removing it. This surely is not a good idea, since it means that the entry, as it stands, gives a distinctly one-sided, not to say misleading, impression of this author's abilities.

For the record, here's the content of the critical reactions section as I originally posted it:

Critical Reaction[edit]

Critical reaction from the mainstream press to Charles's play Counterfeit Skin was largely unfavourable. For The Stage, Matt Truman wrote: "If drama is nothing more than conflict, Counterfeit Skin has it coming out of every pore. Mere opposition alone, however, does not make for dramatic tension...Though themes of dominance and submission, honesty and illusion are handled tidily, the plot is dragged down too many short and unnecessary scenes."^[1]

In the Evening Standard Fiona Mountford noted that "Jason Charles takes as his theme a tangle of modern-day gay relationships and manages, in an eye-watering running time of three hours, to offer barely one original thought or genuine sentiment. The dialogue between the six characters, which appears to have been cut and pasted from the greatest hits of the Pet Shop Boys, makes a low-brow magazine agony aunt seem like the wisdom of the ages by comparison."^[2]

86.129.64.254 (talk) 10:02, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored critical reaction, it seems to be well sourced. Dan D. Ric (talk) 16:48, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ [1], The Stage, Monday 28 January 2008. Accessed Apil 19, 2009.
^ [2], Evening Standard, Monday 28 January 2008. Accessed Apil 19, 2009.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Jason Charles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[The_Stage-1] [1], The Stage, Monday 28 January 2008. Accessed Apil 19, 2009.

[The_Evening_Standard-2] [2], Evening Standard, Monday 28 January 2008. Accessed Apil 19, 2009.

[1]

[2]