Talk:Jean Metzinger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Biography / Arts and Entertainment (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (marked as Top-importance).
 
WikiProject France (Rated C-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Visual arts (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
 

Expansion[edit]

This stub has been expanded to a main article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coldcreation (talkcontribs) 09:22, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

This is a welcome expansion-- I made a few tweaks, including closing spaces before superscripts to ensure that they don't end up on the next line. A remaining problem may be the "Scientific aspects" section, which seems disproportionately long and appears to contain original research. This is sure to get tagged; I'd recommend a more summary style there, with sources. Ewulp (talk) 07:23, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Autosigned by Coldcreation--> Posted by Coldcreation: Thanks for the tweaks. Good point regarding the "Scientific aspects" section. It was indeed too long. I just removed three or four paragraphs from that section, one of which was perhaps borderline on personal research. If anyone is interested, those deleted paragraphs could be posted here for further discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coldcreation (talkcontribs) 21:37, 20 February 2012 (UTC)