Talk:Jesse James Garrett
| This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other concerns about edits related to a living person, please report the issue to the biographies of living persons noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help with issues related to it, please see this page. |
| WikiProject Biography | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
[edit] Archive Discussion
Criticism sections Discussion Archived: Talk:Jesse James Garrett/Archive001 - Sleepnomore 19:42, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
"Jesse James Garrett grew up Florida" isn't here a grammar mistake or something? I'm no native English speaker, but this sentence sounds to me like thanks to him, Florida has grown big. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.125.167.210 (talk) 19:15, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Criticism Section, Again?!?
Seriously, anon user, I can't believe that you came here and unilaterally restored a section that had been deleted by clear consensus over a year ago. If you have an opinion -- and clearly you do, from your revision summary stating that it's "non-objective users" that removed the section a year ago, despite much discussion on this very page -- then bring it here for debate before acting like an ass. Jason t c 18:33, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
-- Can we please not put in a huge criticism section again? I just read through the entire history on that page and it looks like the settlement was to add Delfuego's text ("Jason"?) text about critism without having a huge criticism section by itself. Please do not vandalize and discuss before adding a huge criticism section again.
Thanks, --131.107.0.73 22:44, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Check out the intro paragraph. Not only does it contain a few grammar errors, it also accuses Garrett of arrogance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.251.128.198 (talk) 19:59, 8 December 2009 (UTC)