Talk:Jesuit China missions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject China (Rated B-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Catholicism (Rated B-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Catholicism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
 

Jesuit artillery[edit]

http://books.google.com/books?id=RtsDAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA108#v=onepage&q&f=false

Kuoofra (talk) 08:25, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

1606 conspiracy invasion involving the jesuits and portuguese[edit]

http://books.google.com/books?id=oQ8BFk9K0ToC&pg=PA437#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=zERymZzBQQYC&pg=PA46#v=onepage&q&f=false

In 1617, china suspects catholic missionaries of being portuguese and accuse them of spreading heretical doctrines

http://epress.nus.edu.sg/msl/entry/3254

Rajmaan (talk) 20:40, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Typo in First Sentence of "Dynastic Change" Section?[edit]

"While some Jesuit fathers managed to impress Manchu commanders with a display of western science of ecclesiastical finery and to be politely invited to join the new order . . ."

Shouldn't "of" be regarded as a typo for "or" in the sentence above? 204.57.79.78 (talk) 17:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)