Talk:Jodhpur district

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 07:14, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talukas\tahsils\tehsils[edit]

  • The article currents list 7 talukas and four sub-talukas:
Bilara, Jodhpur, Luni, Osian, Phalodi, Piparcity and Shergarh (subs: Balesar, Bap, Jhanwar and Tinwari)
Balesar, Bap, Bhopalgarh, Bilara, Luni, Mandor, Osian, Phalodi, and Shergarh. Leaves out Jodhpur and Piparcity, promotes Balesar and Bap, with not-mentioned-in-article Bhopalgarh and Mandor.
  • The 2001 Census Population Finder has 7:
Bhopalgarh, Bilara, Jodhpur, Luni, Osian, Phalodi, and Shergarh. It substitutes Bhopalgarh for Piparcity.
Balesar, Bap, Bawadi, Bhopalgarh, Bilara, Luni, Mandor, Osian, Phalodi, and Shergarh. It leaves out Jodhpur and Piparcity.
Balesar, Bap, Bhopalgarh, Bilara, Jodhpur, Luni, Mandor, Osian, Phalodi, and Shergarh. Does not list Piparcity and does not included Bawadi.
Balesar, Bap, Bawadi, Bhopalgarh, Bilara, Jodhpur, Luni, Mandor, Osian, Phalodi, and Shergarh. It leaves out Piparcity.

To me it looks as though Bhopalgarh Taluka is the proper name for one of the two talukas in Piparcity subdivision (the other being Bilara), and that "Piparcity" was never a taluka name. It looks as though Shergarh split into Shergarh and Balesar; while Phalodi spilt into Phalodi and Bap; and Jodhpur split into Jodhpur and Mandor. Bawadi seems to be the result of a split of Bhopalgarh into Bawadi and Bhopalgarh. Several places in the current Bawadi Block were listed under Bhopalgarh in the 2001 census and before that were in the old Lavera Baori Taluk. --Bejnar (talk) 03:38, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In fact the panchayat samities part of the official map: Jodhpur District, Administrative setup shows the first three of those splits, it does not show the Bhopalgarh/Bawadi split. Panchayat samiti are the taluka level administrative councils. It raises the interesting question, "When is a taluka not a taluka?" That same map shows that Bhopalgarh is the name of the taluka and not Piparcity. --Bejnar (talk) 17:14, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've rewritten the section with citations, including the old five subdivision- seven taluka for historical interest. The new Administrative setup file at the official district web site was somewhat helpful, but obviously was done in a hurry, and not proof-read. For example, while the text was updated, the table was not updated from the 2011 version. The Administrative setup file name was changed from ".htm" to ".html". --Bejnar (talk) 20:56, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Taluk HQs[edit]

The village of Baori may be the HQ for Bawadi Taluk and the village of Mandor (Dara Ka Bas) may be the HQ for Mandor Taluk, but we need a reliable source. I have placed question marks in the table for their headquarter villages. Pipar City may be the headquarters for Mandor Taluk, that is one way to interpret the District's Administraitive Setup page which calls the tehsil "Pipar City", but calls the panchayat samiti "Mandor". Almost all other sources call the taluka/tehsil Mandor. --Bejnar (talk) 23:45, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Area[edit]

The official website itself seems unclear about the exact area. At Jodhpur District at a glance-2012: Geography it says "having geographical area of 22850 sq. Kms". At Administrative Setup its says "2256405 hectares", which is 22564.05 sq.km. It repeats "2256405 Hectares" at [Basic Statistics. The Central Ground Water Board cites the 22850 sq.km. figure in its District Profile. --Bejnar (talk) 04:23, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jodhpur district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jodhpur district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jodhpur district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:42, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jodhpur_district&oldid=1203106000"