Talk:John Charles Daly

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

60 Books?[edit]

What is your source for the books he has authored? googuse 00:11, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

John Charles Daly never wrote a book in his life.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.106.171.50 (talk) 00:02, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

I've removed this from the WML article, as it doesn't belong there; but it is not cited, so I will not include it in the article here; take what you want from it: (As writer Joe Persico noted in his 1988 biography of Edward R. Murrow, Daly shortened his name at the request of CBS Vice President Ed Klauber, but the JCD name had lingered on among some listeners and viewers.) TheHYPO (talk) 06:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

I don't know the naming practices of people with long names and junior names, and whatnot. His obit lists him as John Charles Daly Jr. - would it be correct to write it John Charles Patrick Croghan Daly Jr., or is is JCD Jr. not interchangable with the full name? TheHYPO (talk) 22:26, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Charles Daly Pearl Harbor Bulletin myths dispelled[edit]

http://www.authentichistory.com/1939-1945/1-war/2-PH/19411207_1431_CBS_The_World_Today.html advises that the "We Interrupt" bulletin Daly is supposed to have given during Pearl Harbor is actually a re-creation made later for a CBS production. Old radio expert Elizabeth MacLeod concurs here: http://www.mwotrc.com/rr2004_02/expert.htm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kturnerga66 (talk • contribs) 05:16, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So in the recreation, he purposely mispronounced it as "Ohau"? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 05:21, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What about his death?[edit]

I thought Wikipedia had a standard on biographic articles that includes information about the subject's death. Anything at all? MagnoliaSouth (talk) 22:46, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Television citations tag[edit]

I'm not sure I see the need for the "citations needed" banner in the television section. The section seems well-sourced to me. I replaced the only citation needed tag with new citations. Should we take it out? 8bitW (talk) 23:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • By all means do, there are far too many of those templates on Wikipedia. --Maarten1963 (talk) 20:51, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 2 external links on John Charles Daly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:19, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 September 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved Andrewa (talk) 08:14, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John Charles Daly → John Daly (American media personality, born 1914) – per WP:COMMONNAME. Although his full name was John Charles Patrick Croghan Daly, his tombstone is inscribed John Charles Daly and a number of his obituaries were titled "John Charles Daly", he never used "John Charles" as his stage name / professional name. Here is his signature and in his decades-long career on radio and television, he always introduced himself as "John Daly", never as "John Charles Daly". His stint as ABC News president and anchor of ABC Evening News was referenced as John Daly and the News. The announcer for What's My Line?, the game show Daly hosted for 17 years, announces him here as "John Daly". All of his on-screen credits were invariably "John Daly", never "John Charles Daly". As a result of his article's historically-incorrect main title header, most of the numerous links to his article use the historically-incorrect form "John Charles Daly" in their own articles. The nationality and year of birth in the qualifier will disambiguate him from two other media people — John Daly (American media personality, born 1955) and John Daly (Irish TV presenter). —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 05:30, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. You linked to the broadcast of What's My Line? that immediately followed the death of regular panelist Dorothy Kilgallen, resulting in a heavily modified introductory sequence. Ordinarily, the announcer introduced only the first panelist, with each panelist introducing the next and the final panelist (usually Bennett Cerf from 1951 onward) introducing Daly.
    Here are timestamped links to the first five random installments I found on YouTube (in the order in which I viewed them) via a search for the show's title and by clicking through to related videos:
    Video 1
    Video 2
    Video 3
    Video 4
    Video 5
    In four out of five instances (all except #3), Cerf introduced the moderator as "John Charles Daly". Without asserting that this is a perfectly representative sample, I'm confident that he did so on literally hundreds of occasions over the years.
    As noted in the policy that you cited, when disambiguation is required, "using an alternative name that the subject is also commonly called in English reliable sources, albeit not as commonly as the preferred-but-ambiguous title" is considered best (when feasible). Parenthetical disambiguation, conversely, "is Wikipedia's standard disambiguation technique when none of the other solutions lead to an optimal article title".
    In this case, there's no question that the man was commonly called "John Daly", but he also was well known as "John Charles Daly". (It was not by accident that many obituary writers referred to him as such.) With that natural disambiguation available, there simply is no need to append the unwieldy parenthetical disambiguation "(American media personality, born 1914)". —David Levy 11:45, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It is a fact that Bennett Cerf, who had a longtime friendly jocular relationship with Daly, exhibited a predilection for introducing him as "John Charles Daly" (especially in the later years of the show) and, on at least one occasion, introduced him as "John Charles Patrick Croghan Daly". An introduction by anyone else, however, was invariably "John Daly".
In his radio broadcasts, Daly would always say, "This is John Daly" or "John Daly speaking", never referring to himself as "John Charles Daly". When asked in an interview about his reluctance to use the triple name, he explained that he did not wish to be perceived as taking on further patrician airs by using a form resembling John Foster Dulles or Charles Foster Kane.
If the main header were piped as John Daly (American media personality, born 1914)|John Daly, the link would be visible to readers as "John Daly". However, since piping is most frequently used to hide parenthetical qualifiers, there have been very few occasions that any editor has piped John Charles Daly|John Daly and all of these numerous links flowing to the name "John Charles Daly", create the impression that his WP:COMMONNAME was "John Charles", rather than "John". A good example is here, depicting a TV schedule from Daly's era in which the Wikipedia editor who had constructed that schedule (and similar others) indicated the title of the news broadcast as John Charles Daly and the News, rather than the correct form, John Daly and the News. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 21:13, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The backstory behind Cerf's introductions is immaterial, as is the extent to which he influenced others. We need't concern ourselves with why this individual is well known as "John Charles Daly". We need only establish that it's factually accurate and used by reliable sources – conditions that appear to be undisputed.
Likewise, there's no dispute that he was most commonly called "John Daly", but that title is unavailable. As noted above (and documented in the policy that you cited), in such cases, natural disambiguation ("using an alternative name that the subject is also commonly called in English reliable sources, albeit not as commonly") is the preferred solution. Station1 has explained the benefit to readers.
Your argument regarding incoming links reflects a presumption that referring to the article's subject as "John Charles Daly" is incorrect. I disagree (for the reasons stated above). Regardless, piping all of the links to read "John Daly" (should there be consensus for that) would be a trivially simple task for a bot to carry out. Your desire to force such piping by making the article's title unsuitable for use in prose has no basis in policy.
"John Charles Daly and the News" certainly is incorrect, but a single editor's error – even if unequivocally attributable to this article's title (which it isn't, given the previously discussed fact that the man has been well known as "John Charles Daly" since the 1950s) – doesn't justify the change that you propose. —David Levy 22:45, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As there is an absence of dispute that subject was most commonly called "John Daly" (the image currently used in the infobox depicts subject above a prominent nameplate, "JOHN DALY"), there is also no dispute that he was frequently referenced as "John Charles Daly" or even "John Charles Daly, Jr.". Both of those forms would have served well as redirects, analogous to the redirect which depicts the rarely-used full form, John Charles Patrick Croghan Daly.
One may argue that Wikipedia users who, instead of typing John Charles Daly, type John Daly and proceed to the disambiguation page where they would have found and clicked upon John Daly (American media personality, born 1914), instead of finding the current form, John Charles Daly, would have been better served since "John Daly" was the form used by subject, himself, throughout his career. I had hoped that, on such basis, deference would be extended to the more-common WP:COMMONNAME, even if such form necessitated the use of a lengthy qualifier, rather than the less-common WP:COMMONNAME which avoided the qualifier.
From the time of this article's creation over 13 years ago, on May 18, 2004, the most-appropriate form of subject's name to be used in the article's main title header has never been discussed. Since Wikipedia will be around for centuries or even millennia, this matter may return for consideration, given the interest in the remote past and the ability to recapture long-gone broadcast signals. In the meantime, the historical record of this discussion, such as it is, may serve as an indication to those who care that it was raised and submitted for consideration. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 03:39, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
One may argue that Wikipedia users who, instead of typing John Charles Daly, type John Daly and proceed to the disambiguation page where they would have found and clicked upon John Daly (American media personality, born 1914), instead of finding the current form, John Charles Daly, would have been better served since "John Daly" was the form used by subject, himself, throughout his career.
Users arriving at the disambiguation page currently see the following:
  • John Charles Daly (1914–1991), American radio and television newsman and host of the TV panel game show What's My Line?
Readers aware that "'John Daly' was the form used by subject, himself, throughout his career" are highly likely to identity the desired article from the above description with little difficulty. —David Levy 04:46, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per David Levy above. He was very commonly known as John Charles Daly[1][2][3][4] and natural, neutral disambiguation of an article title is almost always preferable to artificial parenthetical qualifiers. With plain John Daly unavailable, readers are much more likely to search for John Charles Daly than for "American media personality" while also knowing when he was born. Station1 (talk) 21:48, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ironically, in your first example (from November 23, 1958), the paper's editor appended the headline, "John Charles Daly's 4 Lives", apparently ignoring the fact that the syndicated column carried the byline "By JOHN DALY". As for the lengthy qualifier, no one would expect users to type "John Daly (American media personality, born 1914)". However, if that were the article's main title header, there would still be two basic methods of accessing the article — typing the John Charles Daly redirect or typing John Daly and searching for the most appropriate entry among the names listed upon the disambiguation page. Either way, there would be no greater inconvenience to users than there is under the present circumstances. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 03:39, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your rationale appears to be based on disagreement with Wikipedia's longstanding preference for natural disambiguation, not a concern relevant to this article in particular. —David Levy 04:46, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed the John Daly byline, and if John Daly were available as a title I'd have no problem with it. Whether the headline writer ignored the byline or purposely used "John Charles Daly" and "broadcaster" to better identify him to the paper's readers is something we'll never know. Your second point, that there would be no greater inconvenience to searchers under the proposal than there is at present, is true. But by the same token, there would be no greater convenience. Since there would be no improvement to the status quo on that score, I still think his actual name is a better choice than artificial disambiguation. Station1 (talk) 07:19, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Charles Daly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:09, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:John_Charles_Daly&oldid=1200464213"