 |
John Flamsteed was a good article, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Delisted version: September 14, 2006
|
 |
John Flamsteed is included in the Wikipedia CD Selection, see John Flamsteed at Schools Wikipedia. Please maintain high quality standards; if you are an established editor your last version in the article history may be used so please don't leave the article with unresolved issues, and make an extra effort to include free images, because non-free images cannot be used on the DVDs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
 |
The article on John Flamsteed is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia. |
|
 Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| High |
This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. |
| More information: |
| |
|
|
|
|
At least one photograph is included in this article |
|
|
This article does not require a map |
|
|
This article needs to have an infobox added |
|
|
This article does not need statistics |
|
|
|
|
[edit] Parents/ guardian
If possible, I think it would be good to mention his parents and their profession. That information goes a long way in explaining someone personality. gathima 01:50, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Confict with Newton
This section really needs rewording; it's hardly NPOV with it's blaitent accusations against Newton. At least mention the reasons for the disagreement: Flamsteed was refusing to publish work that had been commissioned by the king. CFLeon 21:25, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
I'm going to try to reword it. IronCrow 01:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Reworded the conflict again, and added a reference. Sobel's book covers the material in this edited paragraph only, but I still removed the "unreferenced" warning. Wasoxygen (talk) 7 April 2011 —Preceding undated comment added 13:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC).
[edit] Delisted GA
There's no body, so there can't be a lead, so the article can't conform with WP:LEAD. This can probably be fixed easily because you have several paragraphs here, but also, you'll need more references to fully reference this article, and you'll also need inline citations, the GA criteria was recently changed to make them mandatory. And please, don't just stamp the page again without even appearing to of reviewed this article.... Homestarmy 16:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
.jpg)
