Talk:John Sherman Cooper

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleJohn Sherman Cooper is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 23, 2014.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 17, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
December 5, 2011WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
January 7, 2012Good article nomineeListed
February 28, 2012WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
May 2, 2012Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 23, 2022.
Current status: Featured article

Ny times obit and current text[edit]

Unfortunately the current text follows a little too closely the text of the obit from the new york times that the thomas clearly shows was being added w/out prejudicing the nytimes copyright. I nominated it for copyedit and added the obit url. --Haakonsson (talk) 22:57, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The entry does plagiarize the New York Times obit; see http://www.nytimes.com/1991/02/23/obituaries/john-sherman-cooper-dies-at-89-longtime-senator-from-kentucky.html Also another respondent is quite right: Senator Cooper was never ever referred to as John S. Cooper, always John Sherman Cooper. I was born in Louisville in 1945 and have been a Kentuckian most of my life.Kagathos (talk) 18:52, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Propose moving to John Sherman Cooper[edit]

Unless someone can provide a persuasive reason not to make this change, I intend to move this article to John Sherman Cooper. The reason is very simple: I am old enough to remember his service in the Senate, and the plain fact is that he was always referred to as "John Sherman Cooper" - NOT as "John S. Cooper". Cgingold 15:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted False Statement[edit]

I deleted the following:

"Refusing to follow the Republican Party's non-support for civil rights,"

If one goes to the Wikipedia page on the 1964 Civil Rights Act, they will find a breakdown of the final vote on the 1964 CRA, by political party. Over 80% of Senate and House Republicans voted FOR the CRA, whereas only about two out of three Democrats in both chambers voted for it. MindBodySoul (talk) 07:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First senate vote in 1947[edit]

The article currently says the following:

In the first roll-call vote of his career, he opposed transferring investigatory powers to Republican Owen Brewster's special War Investigating Committee.

However, Clarice James Mitchiner's book (not spelled Mitchener, please), Senator John Sherman Cooper: Consummate Statesman, says on pages 63–64 that Cooper voted against the notion that the investigation of war crimes should be moved to its own committee. His vote was in favor of keeping such investigations in an existing committee. What does the referenced source say about Brewster and a special committee? What do other sources say about Cooper's first senate vote? Binksternet (talk) 01:36, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did he have kid(s)?[edit]

To User:Acdixon:

Is me again, I think shall least mention this even there's no children.--Jarodalien (talk) 16:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's fine. I don't remember finding any sources that made the explicit statement that he had no children, so I didn't include it because I couldn't source it. However, I'm convinced this was the case based on the lack of mention of children in any of the sources I consulted. I should think the statement would be unlikely to be challenged. Acdixon (talk · contribs) 16:53, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Sherman Cooper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:46, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]