Talk:John Zerzan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Philosophy (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Biography (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 

This article has comments here.

WikiProject Oregon (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
The current collaborations of the month are Oregon Lighthouses & Oregon Book Award.
This article has an assessment summary page.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Eichmanns[edit]

This article needs to be deleted or comprehensively rewritten. There are 15 dead links in the reference section, and multiple citation needed flags. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pozzdonn (talkcontribs) 08:51, 21 October 2013 (UTC) Up for deletion, you are welcome to comment. Okip 05:45, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Why ? What are the problems with the article ? Just rewrite the article if it is that bad, don't delete it. John Zerzan is one the authors having most contributed to anarcho-primitivism, he is certainly notable. Adressing anarchism philosophies without including anarcho-primitivism or its most important authors would be ridiculously unexhaustive.76.10.181.143 (talk) 20:24, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Oups, I tought the "John Zerzan" article itself was up to deletion, rather than "Little Eichmanns".76.10.181.143 (talk) 20:27, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Why here doesn't appear that he was marxist-leninist and the reference of the underground of his cousin, as in the Infoshop Openwiki ? "As a Marxist-Leninist-Maoist in the late 1960s he worked as a social worker for the state of California." Bakunin was democratic nacionalist and Kropotkin a marxist before be antiautoritarian people, so what is the reason for hide this?

And then: " At this time, Zerzan's cousin, Kathan, was an active member of the Weather Underground, a militant group that had grown out of the radical Students for a Democratic Society. Throughout the 1970s, the underground group planted bombs in dozens of buildings including The Pentagon, the U.S. Capitol, and the California Department of Corrections. This is regarded as a major influence on John Zerzan's growing radicalism. " I think that must be add that to the original article . Accionapunk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.95.69.236 (talk) 22:42, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

The page says that Zerzan's criticisms have extended "as far" as subjects such as time[edit]

I find this language to be discriminatory...if Zerzan is right in his line of thinking then it's not so much that his criticisms are far-reaching but that other critics have failed to grasp the complete picture. There must be better language that could be used here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.28.162.78 (talk) 01:14, 5 November 2011 (UTC)