 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
|
|
 Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
This article is supported by WikiProject Nebraska. |
| |
|
|
|
|
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. |
|
| WikiProject Nebraska To-do: |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues/Sports task force, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Event Venues/Sports task force articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. |
|
|
|
|
I agree, the entire "Save Rosenblatt" section is unsuitable for an encyclopedia, most likely written by one of the whackos from the "Save Rosenblatt" committee. I recommend either a complete overhaul or outright deletion of the section. 204.58.233.6 (talk) 14:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm all for pulling the section as well. A re-write would be nice, but given the climate of the situation, it'd be tricky to write a truly fair and balanced article containing any information about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.177.25.208 (talk) 14:37, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:POLL101088762.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:POLL101088762.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sawblade05 (talk to me | my wiki life) 10:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] "Rosenblatt and the Omaha Royals"
I feel that this section is a heavy editorial as well. Could it maybe be improved in the rewrite?JEDIMAN40 (talk) 04:26, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Second paragraph of intro
This was not the last game played at Rosenblatt, not even the last baseball game. The last baseball game will be on sept 2, 2010 with the Omaha royals final game before the end of the season. The last game played period will be some weirdo game by the UFL. This is simply the last College World Series game. This should be spelled out. Barsportsunlimited (talk) 03:39, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Y Done Enigmamsg 03:49, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Is tone encyclopedic enough now?
Other than something published to cite as the goals of the former "Save Rosenblatt" group, isn't this article generally encylopedic enough to lose the "tone" template?75.200.158.141 (talk) 14:44, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- I support a removal of the tone tag. Kithira (talk) 17:21, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=small}
