Talk:Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject United States / Government (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (marked as Low-importance).
 
WikiProject Computing (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject Military history (Rated Stub-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality assessment scale.

FAS[edit]

Looks like the meat of this article came from the fas.org website. Isn't this considered copyvio???

Supersquid 14:07, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Outdated?[edit]

This seems like it's outdated as well.

Redundant paras[edit]

The first three paragraphs were copies of the subsequent paras., sans markup, and with one additional opening sentence. Perhaps this was done in order to dispel copyvio claims? I don't know, and won't be investigating it; however, from a style point of view the article is better off now. --Arkeides 19:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

What are SCI levels?[edit]

The article currently refers to SCI levels, without any explanation of what they are. So, what are SCI levels? What is SCI?

I came to this article because a passage in the 2006 decision memo that resulted in Guantanamo captive Sultan Sari Sayel Al Anazi's repatriation stated[1]

The Board reviewed and considered the associated SCI material for this case and considered it relevant but redundant. This information is being forwarded separately via JWICS to the Director, OARDEC.


Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 17:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Sensitive Compartmented Information there ya go on what SCI is. JDBlues (talk) 20:01, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Ah... Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 03:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Ha ha, I know where the green door is... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.173.58.161 (talk) 02:46, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

  1. ^ OARDEC (28 July 2006). "Classified Record of Proceedings and basis of Administrative Review Board recommendation for ISN 507". United States Department of Defense. pp. pages 85–93. Retrieved 2008-05-05.