Talk:José Arraño Acevedo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Biography (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Chile (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Re. Notability[edit]

I did read the guideline. :) WP:AUTHOR states "The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors." His field was the history of Cardenal Caro and Pichilemu, he wrote two books which are constantly cited by related articles in different publications, such as a local newspaper called Pichilemu News and his articles have appeared in books (1, 2, 3, 4). So yes, I'd say he's notable. I may be wrong, though. Diego Grez (talk) 20:12, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

So, if you think that José Arraño has notability, u've to expand it adding reliable, published sources:
  1. It seems that isn't regarded as an important figure or isn't widely cited by peers or successors.
  2. The person isn't known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique.
  3. The person hasn't created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
  4. The person's work either (a) hasn't become a significant monument, (b) hasn't been a substantial part of a significant exhibition or (c) hasn't won significant critical attention.
Besides, you have to be careful with refs, coz the first one is quite similar to Life section and for me, it's quite similar to a derivative work —something that is "based on or derived from" another work. Redards. —Jmvgpartner (talk) 20:27, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
I don't think the person's article has to comply with all of these points. Pablo Neruda, for instance, wasn't a person who originated a new concept, theory or technique, but he has played an important role in Chilean literature. It is not exactly the case of Arraño, but you might get the point :) Diego Grez (talk) 20:31, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Don't be confused: Pablo Neruda won the Nobel Prize "for a poetry that with the action of an elemental force brings alive a continent's destiny and dreams". He played an important role in World literature; it isn't the case of Arraño at all. Greetings. —Jmvgpartner (talk) 21:22, 7 August 2012 (UTC)