This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
It looks like a B class article, but footnotes 11 and 13 (Barron p. 154-155) seem to be the same. I'm not sure what "pp. 154–155 of pp. 129–160" means. Please clear this up please. Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 00:17, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Djmaschek: Thanks so much for taking the time to review the article for the Milhist WikiProject. The phrase you're asking about ("pp. 154-155 of pp. 129-160") is one method of formatting footnotes that has been used by various publishers over the years; in this case, it just means that the specific reference to Burlazzi was contained on pp. 154-155 of the larger segment of content in which that Burlazzi reference fell (in "pp. 129-160"). Citing it this way lets readers know where to find the beginning of the battle description, as well as the page on which the specific Burlazzi reference is located. But since that formatting was problematic in your review, I've changed the formatting for both to just "pp. 154-155". Will that bring the article up to B-class for you? 47thPennVols (talk) 00:36, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
