This article is part of WikiProject for Classical Greece and Rome, a collaborative group of contributors who write Wikipedia's Classics articles. If you would like to join the WikiProject and learn how to contribute, please see our project page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgrade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgrade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dacia, a WikiProject aimed to better organize and improve the quality and accuracy of the articles related to ancient Dacia and primarily to the history of Dacians, Getae and Moesi. If you would like to participate, please improve this article and/or join the project and help with our open tasks. If you have questions regarding the goals of the project, as well as the time span, space, people and culture in the project scope, please review them here. Your input is welcomed!
No, this is an encyclopedia, not a dictionary.--Panairjdde 17:33, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This could use a disambiguation page, as the astronomy usage, the Roman emporer, the language use, and the Roman god Jupiter are enough to justify it. StuRat 18:59, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
I see only two uses, the astronomic usage, as adjective of planet Jupiter, and the Roman emperor. One is related to the dictionary, the other to the encyclopedia. I am against a disambiguation page; if you want, you can put a notice at the beginning of the page, if there exists a jovian (astronomy) article, that is.--Panairjdde 07:52, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
The 4 uses are:
Referring specifically to the planet Jupiter, alone.
Referring to the class of planets like Jupiter, which includes Saturn and may or may not include Uranus and Neptune.
Again, you should understand that this is an encyclopedia, not a dictionary. If you must, just write a note at the beginning of the page, something like "For the planet, see Jupiter."--Panairjdde 13:00, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
I'm not going to take further action right now, but may get back to this sometime. Meanwhile, if anyone else renames it or takes this to Wikipedia:Requested moves, let me know on my talk page. Gene Nygaard (talk) 14:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Note that inappropriate links on the article's "What links here" are one clue that a change should be made.
Note also that many of the links on "what links here" which are appropriate to this article are only there as a result of that big, ugly honking navigation box on the bottom of the page. All of them could be fixed in one fell swoop if this article is renamed, merely by changing the link in the template. The existence of those links due (only to that obnoxious template whose purpose would be as well served by categories and lists) on the "What links here" page makes it much more difficult to find the ones which are inappropriate to this article.
Having "Jovian" as a disambiguation page would make future cleanup of those links easier. Gene Nygaard (talk) 14:52, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
In the beggining of the article it is stated 17. february 364. Later on, it is said that he died from a wound 26 June 363. I don't know which of those two dates are correct, but that should be corrected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stalker314314 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Jovian is a rare adjectival form meaning of or like Jove or Jupitor. Earthian can rarely mean of or like Earth but it most commonly refers to the series. MarcusQwertyus 07:09, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Terran would be a more apt analogy (though that article is properly a disambiguation page because there are many more uses for "Terran" than for "Jovian"). Nonetheless, I still believe "Jovian" primarily refers to attributes of the planet, particularly the Jovian moons. PowersT 15:31, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Support definitely a good idea, per statistics it's very clear which is dominant.Aldux (talk) 13:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Oppose per LtPowers. I think "Jovian" as an adjective meaning "of Jupiter" is more common than any other meaning. I don't think it's a "rare adjectival form" as suggested; it is quite common in science-related works. Search for "jovian" on google scholar and you will have to really search to find stuff that is not about the planet Jupiter. This is the reason the first entry on Jovian refers to it being an adjective for Jupiter. Good Ol’factory(talk) 03:57, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.