Talk:Judiciary of Italy

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy High‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Untitled[edit]

Um, how long has that first line about judges being corrupt been there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.233.255.146 (talk) 04:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rosanamgoong.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Enhancing the 'Judiciary of Italy' Wikipedia page: seeking feedback and clarifications[edit]

Hi everyone,

Over the last several months, in my (very rare) spare time, I've been dedicating efforts to enhance the "Judiciary of Italy" page. I believe significant improvements have been made.

Firstly, I'm curious about any specific sections you think should be further developed. I'm open to suggestions as my goal is to complete the review by 2024.

Secondly, I'd like to discuss the current status of the page. Specifically, I'm seeking insights (possibly from a moderator) on whether the page still qualifies as a "stub." Given the recent updates, could it now be considered at "start" level? Or, if not, I'd appreciate any advice on how to elevate its quality to reach the "start" level.

For January and February, my focus will be on refining two key sections: one concerning the laws of Italy and the other on constitutional principles.

Lastly, I'm interested in understanding the historical assessment of this project. When was it deemed of low importance, and what criteria were used in this evaluation? Could it be related to the visualisation realised by the page?

Best, ParadiseCity (talk) 12:26, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tbh, I did not expect a ton of replies, yet I had hoped that a moderator would give me some elucidations as regards the page's status. Feel free to reach out to me if you have any info and/or want to collaborate on this project. ParadiseCity (talk) 22:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]