This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Tonight I uploaded Justified onto my iTunes so I could put it onto my iPod and when the album has finished uploading all the songs were the but I saw a song called Worthy Of was on the list???? I've had this album since 2003 and listened to it heaps back then but then I lost it and only found it a month ago and so decided to put it onto my ipod. When I uploaded it onto iTunes I went through all the songs to see if I remembered any of them and I did but when I listened to this song it didn't rang any bells. It ain't listed on the album and I did a search a google and nothing. Is it a hidden track? Or my cd like one a million and special lol I wish. - I have a copy of the CD as well, and it also features Worthy Of, maybe a UK bonus track? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 19:48, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
In addition to some copyedit and formatting, I removed the bit about the Super Bowl incident, which really has nothing to do with the album and is covered in the article on the person. Jgm 02:37, 13 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Looks like a reasonable first effort, Kirk. I look forward to seeing more album articles from you in the future. Note that JGM's copyediting is perfectly normal behaviour on the Wikipedia and should be welcomed. One of our other contributors produced great articles on boxing but unfortunately wasn't too hot on grammar and spelling. Nevertheless I was always happy to see new articles from him because his content was great and the rest of us found it easy to fix up the format/grammar/spelling stuff. Also note that all Wikipedia articles are joint efforts, so we don't sign our work directly in the article. However, if you log in before contributing, the Wikipedia software will do that for you in the page history. -- Derek Ross 06:28, 13 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Yes, great job Kirk! You may be interested in checking out Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums as well as Wikipedia:Music standards. I made a few further copyedits to the article, mostly just tweaking the wording, but also to make it more in line with our NPOV policy -- most importantly, the beginning implied that Timberlake had successfully transitioned out of the boy band image, when in fact it's much too early to tell what's going to happen to him. Tuf-Kat 06:45, Feb 13, 2004 (UTC)
I didn't think the Justified page went up, I tried to delete what I had written after I read Derek's article on Justin Timberlake, which covered much of the same ground. I haven't been back until today, so I'm glad its up and was well recieved. I'm looking at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums and looking forward to filling any gaps. Thanks for the copyediting. I've changed the second sentence. I hope conveys the same idea. -kirk 09:21, Feb19, 2004 (pst).
On the RIAA site, it is clearly stated in their searchable database that the album has only been certified 3x Platinum and has not yet been certified 4x Platinum as was previously put on this article.
Also his album is not certified 7x platinum either which it is now saying and its one of them that you can't edit or i would...yes he has sold 7 million copies for justified world wide but the world wide platinum is 2 million...therefore he is 3x platinum in the usa, and 3x paltinum world wide
I have taken out the "trivia" about "Rock Your Body" on 3 different pages. Justin Timberlake wrote the song with Hugo & Williams and I have not found anywhere that this song was intended for Michael Jackson. Writing that "it is a widely known fact" that the song was intended for MJ does not make it a widely known fact, especially without references. The only place I could find that piece of trivia was on the "Songfacts" website, which is often wrong and has unsourced information. Marnifrances 02:03, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
In the article it says the album was recorded between May 17th 2002 and August 26th 2002. On the page of the song Cry Me A River it also says 2002. However, this cannot be entirely true since in the beginning of the song "Renegade" by Jay-Z and Em one can hear Justin Timberlake singing the chorus ("Cry me a river") and Jay-Z's album "The Blueprint" (which contains the song "Renegade") was released on 9/11, several months before May 17th 2002.88.77.3.39 (talk) 18:36, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Primarily an R&B album, Justified also contains influences of dance-pop, funk and soul music ---> According to the infobox it says "R&B, pop and dance-pop", however this is "R&B with influences from dance-pop"?
More comments to follow. Sorry for the delay because of my busy work at school. — Simon (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
1) unlink rap duo in lead
rap duo is not relevant to this article, Clipse is.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 16:17, 17 September 2013
unlinked, even though Clipse are a rap duo, so it bares some relevance.
2) Both Timberlake's and Aguilera's managers suggested to both singers to go on a conjoint tour.→First "both" is extra
3) For the tour, Timberlake would perform with eight dancers, a 14-piece band which includes→performed and included (past tense)
4) concluded on June 19, 2004 in Brisbane, Australia.→ended or finished
'Concluded' is just a synonym of those words. Same meaning.
5) Robert Christgau should be placed third in the box→C, not R
What's the current status of this review? The last reviewer comments here are almost two weeks old, and I don't see any sign that they've been addressed yet. Is the review done, or is this waiting on more review comments as well as more action from the nominator? Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:54, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
I'm waiting for the review comments to be finished so I and Tomica can wrap this all up. Not much point in addressing issues when the review's not finished. Also, most of the issues have indeed been addressed. Et3rnal 23:39, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Since the article doesn't have any major issues, I'll take the freedom to close the review as passed. I believe the main reviewer is busy at the moment and new comments won't be coming any time soon. Congratulations.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 21:17, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
I'm a bit stunned that you would pass this when Et3rnal said "most of the issues" were addressed, not all of them. Could you not have asked for the last of them to be addressed and waited until they had been accomplished and you'd checked them to pass it? Also, did anyone do a close paraphrasing check? I'd be happier if Background section's "The Neptunes were working on multiple tracks" and the source's "the Neptunes are working on multiple tracks" were not virtually identical, and if the prose in that section didn't have occasional grammatical errors that frankly don't belong in a GA. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:57, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
If you feel that the article doesn't meet GA, then put it up for reassessment. Et3rnal 22:05, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
If you see the article's history, I've addressed all of the remaining issues, except for the "consists" tweak, which I consider inappropriate.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 22:13, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Post Scriptum - I did took a final look at the prose and corrected two minor errors (eleventh→twelfth and Track listings→Track listing). The rest is satisfying according to me.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 22:18, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Et3rnal, my point is that it shouldn't even be an issue, and Вик Ретлхед was clearly premature in pushing the button at a point when review issues were unaddressed and it did not meet GA. It's much closer now, and I don't have the time nor the desire to pursue a reassessment unless pushed to it. However, the second paragraph of "Background" is not up to the prose standard expected ("him" is misused, and the sentences are not well constructed), and I'm hoping that one of you will take the time to improve it so it is. The failure to change the identified close paraphrasing is, I must confess, not encouraging, given how easily it could have been addressed. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the constructive comments. Did some minor corrections in the second paragraph, if you have some other remarks, be my guest.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 22:57, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
So sorry for my delay, as I want to thank Вик Ретлхед for reviewing this. So much sorry. — Simon (talk) 11:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.