Talk:KDE Plasma Workspaces
|WikiProject Software / Computing||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
|WikiProject Free Software / Software / Computing||(Rated Start-class)|
|WikiProject Linux||(Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)|
Borderline C but some may not agree.
I got a message saying this was proposed for deletion. I didn't figure out how to find out why. I assume because KDE4 is out. Could the person who marked it for deletion post why here? Shortgeek (talk) 20:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
I have removed the Stub status of this article in the WikiProject Computing block, but don't know what class the article does belong to. If someone else knows, please fill it in. Starofale (talk) 21:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
2011-04-26 Review thoughts:
You have done a very appreciated job of trying to connect prior terms to current, thank you!
So many terms flying around, changing so frequently, articles like this help - thank you for having it here to refer to.
- "In its default configuration it resembles earlier KDE Software Compilation releases ..." - can you refine? KDE was a set of software, including a display manager. Plasma is only a display manager (if I follow your article correctly). Today, KDE still seems to be a set of software, that includes Plasma as its display manager. So your sentence is confusing. Perhaps "In its default configuration, Plasma resembles the former KDE display manager, part of the KDE Software Compilation, ...
-- Part of the confusion is KDE used to be 'KDE'. Now KDE includes Plasma. KDE <!=> Plasma, but it could be commonly construed in the past that KDE <=> KDE.
- "Plasma Active is not a workspace on its own. It is a service built on top of the Plasma frameworks that enables the creation of full-fledged workspaces using only QML files without the need to program in C++." The earlier implication is that Plasma is the display manager. Here, Plasma Active is not a display manager, but built on Plasma frameworks. Leading to the question
--- how is something displayed if there is no display manager? Perhaps Plasma Active is a framework to sit upon a device's native display manager?
- "Two examples of containments are the desktop background and the taskbar" Does the taskbar sit on top of the background? i.e. An example of a containment with a containment?
- "containment can be anything the developer wants: an image (either raster graphics or an SVG image), animation, or even OpenGL. Images are most commonly used, but with Plasma the user could set any applet as the desktop background " earlier you note "Plasma separates components into "data engines" and their visualization counterparts". In this section you have mixed the two, could you continue to separate them? "the user could set any applet to provide the desktop background image"?
- "Widgets are aware of their size and can be made to show more or less data depending on their size. Plasma can support other widgets." - you have crossed from applets to widgets here. Pick one term , or, explain what widgets are. Connect those dots.
... sorry, ran out of gas on this, stopping here.
- I have no idea who you are talking to and I also have no idea what your “<!=>” stuff means.
- Some of your feedback is valid, other feedback is not. Eg. where do you have your “display manager” stuff from? Seems you don’t know what a display manager (KDE Display Manager) is. Maybe you also confuse it with X window managers (KWin), widget toolkits (Qt), X.Org Server, or whatever. Whatever it is you confuse, it is out of scope of this article to explain how typical Linux distributions are set up in order to render graphics on screen. --KAMiKAZOW (talk) 01:22, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Fixed "non-native language" mentioned in the Cleanup box from Feb. 2014 but not sure what constitutes "inappropriate tone." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 18:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC)