Talk:Kaj Ulrik Linderstrøm-Lang

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Genetics  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Genetics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Genetics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Denmark (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Biography / Science and Academia (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group (marked as Mid-importance).
 

Style[edit]

I have some issues with the writing style in this article. I don't think subjective and personal phrases such as wonderful and cool belong in an encyclopedia article. I rephrased cool, but I haven't removed wonderful, because I didn't have the references used. I suggest that however has the articles, WillowW?, tries to rephrase the most subjective parts... Kjaergaard 06:01, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

You're right, I'm sorry :( I sometimes get a little carrried away, and Linderstrom-Lang is one of my favorite scientists. But the memoirs of many of his direct students echo their admiration for his personality as well as his science. (I'll add a few more references shortly.) As an aside, I think he's a good role model for PI's ;)


Accuracy[edit]

Linderstrom-Lang didn't contribute quaternary structure. That was Bernal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.197.70 (talk) 21:14, 20 March 2012 (UTC)