Talk:Kamishichiken

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Maiko/Geiko List[edit]

There is currently no precedent to have or maintain a complete list of the active maiko/geiko in a particular district, not even the wikipedia page in Japanese. They only go as far as to list some of the more common geisha lines of descent, like Ume-, Katsu-, Nao- Ichi-, etc. Since the information is hard enough to verify, let alone update constantly, I am editing it to reflect such limits (re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Sources in languages other than English). Claw789 22:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Revision Concerns[edit]

1. The photograph on the main page is the intellectual property of a Flickr user lovelyhoneybee, Spring 2007 165, from Nara, Japan. Originally posted here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/lovelyhoneybee/531447609/ Please see Wikipedia:Image_use_policy

2. Verifiability and neutral point of view is an issue. To date, Ichimame is currently the only maiko from Kamishichiken with a verified blog. Please refrain from vague, unsourced statements such as '"To say that you have just come from a northern ozashiki hold a little status!"' Also, Lulu Press is a self-publisher. Self-published books and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources. See Wikipedia:Spam and Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_and_questionable_sources_in_articles_about_themselves

3. A link to Fujika's blog might belong in Gion. Can you site why she is a "renegade"? Claw789 10:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kamishichiken. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]