Talk:Karian Shola National Park

India: Karnataka / Protected areas Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Protected areas of India workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was submitted or expanded as part of the 2015 Wikipedia Asian Month.

Independent park or a part of the Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary and National Park?[edit]

What is the relationship of this park to the Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary and National Park? Google Maps do not find "Karian Shola National Park", so I wonder whether it still exists as an independent entity. Currently the coordinates provided in the article are for the Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary and National Park. Maybe these articles should be merged? Micromesistius (talk) 17:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Micromesistius: Having just expanded this article, I added the coordinates because they were mentioned in this source, but they apply to the whole of the Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary. It would seem from the source that there are three national parks within the sanctuary. It states "It was notified as a sanctuary in the year 1974. 108 sq.kms of its unique habitats at 3 places - Karian Shola, Grass hills, Manjampatty were notified as National Parks in 1989." Each of these national parks, Manjampatti Valley, Grass Hills National Park and Karian Shola has a Wikipedia article and I see no reason to merge them into the Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary and National Park article. However, I will add a bit more to the article explaining that this park is part of the Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:57, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The page you mentioned does not really make clear whether they still exist as independent units. I am inclined to think that they have ceased to exist, because they are not listed under "National parks" on the left. Also protectedplanet.net does not recognize Karian Shola (nor the other two), whereas Indira Gandhi NP is listed. If my interpretation is correct, I think the best solution would be to merge all these into the Indira Gandhi NP article — but before taking up that discussion, the facts should be clarified. Micromesistius (talk) 21:15, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Karian Shola National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071102053921/http://www.forests.tn.nic.in/WildBiodiversity/np_ignp.html to http://www.forests.tn.nic.in/wildbiodiversity/np_ignp.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:31, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]