|↓||Skip to table of contents||↓|
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kayastha article.|
|Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3|
|This is not a forum for general discussion about Kayastha. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Kayastha at the Reference desk, discuss relevant Wikipedia policy at the Village pump, or ask for help at the Help desk.|
|Please be calm and civil when you make comments or when you present evidence, and avoid personal attacks. Please be patient as we work toward resolution of the issues in a peaceful, respectful manner.|
|This page was nominated for deletion on April 4, 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.|
|Kayastha received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.|
|WikiProject India / West Bengal||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
|The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose sanctions on any editor editing this page or associated pages. Please familiarize yourself with the sanctions authorized for this topic area before making further edits.|
|This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot I. Any threads with no replies in 3 months may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived.|
- 1 Notable Kayasthas: Names removed
- 2 Semi-protected edit request on 9 June 2014
- 3 Ironic: Real Kayasthas excluded and non-Kayasthas included
- 4 Discussion on current version of this Article https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kayastha&oldid=618943617
- 5 Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2014
- 6 Semi-protected edit request on 14 August 2014
Notable Kayasthas: Names removed
User:Sitush removed the following names form the list of notable Kayasthas. All very notable, all Kayasthas. Justification?
Sitush projects himself as an authority on the subject of castes of India.
- Nagendranath Bose
- Jaiprakash Narayan
- Subhashchandra Bose
- Dr. Shanti Swaroop Bhatnagar
- Nandalal Bose
- Maharshi Mahesh Yogi
- Sir Jadunath Sarkar
- Professor Amar Bose, founder of Bose
@Malaiya Now they have been included. BTW no one is an authority here, we all need references to prove or disprove our edits. No original research is to be done on wikipedia --का.शि.. Kayastha Shiromani , The Second. (talk) 10:04, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 9 June 2014
|This edit request has been answered. Set the
Names of many prominent kayastha personalities has not been included. They are Amitabh Bachhan, Sonu Nigam, Shanti Swaroop Bhatnagar, Mukesh (playback singer), Jay Prakash Narayan, Rabindranath Tagore, Bal Thakrey, S.N.Bose, Jagdish Chandra Bose, Padmsree Sharda Sinha, Ravi Shankar Prasad, Shatrughan Sinha, Sri Aurobindo, Manna De. Bhartiya 88 (talk) 12:23, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
The requirements for inclusion are:-
- An article on enWikipedia
- A reliable source confirming that the individual is Kayastha
In addition, the Bachchan family, have specifically rejected membership of any castes and therefore are not included in any caste articles
So, lets split your list up:-
- Mukesh (playback singer), Jay Prakash Narayan, Bal Thakrey, S.N.Bose, Padmsree Sharda Sinha - do not appear to have articles
- Amitabh Bachchan, Rabindranath Tagore, Jagadish Chandra Bose, Shatrughan Sinha, Sri Aurobindo, Manna Dey - do not mention Kayastha at all in their articles
- Shanti Swaroop Bhatnagar - mentions Kayastha, but has no source for this
- Sonu Nigam and Ravi Shankar Prasad - have sources, but I need to check on their reliability, before adding the names to the article
- OK - I have checked the sources and added Sonu Nigam and Ravi Shankar Prasad
- I have removed Harivansh Rai Bachchan as per the note above, regarding the Bachcham family
- I have removed Munshi Premchand, A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada and Subhas Chandra Bose as their only references were to Wikipedia and their articles do not even mention they are Kayastha
- If you can find reliable sources for the names you have mentioned - or those I have removed, please add this information, including the detailed references, to their individual Wikipedia articles, before asking for their addition to this article. Arjayay (talk) 14:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Rabindranath Tagore was not a Kayasth, he was a brahmin. A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada was not a Kayasth, he was a Suvarnavanik. Harivansh Rai Bachchan was a Kayastha. I have his autobiography.
- People are born in a caste. Caste is a birth based classification. That is why it is termed a "jati" (or "zat" in Urdu). It is not a club that people can join and resign at will. Nobel laureate Toni Morrison called Bill Clinton "the first Black president", and Bill Clinton loved being called "the first Black president". But being "white" is by birth. A white can marry an black (Harivansh Rai Bachchan's second wife was a Khatri), but would still be white. Malaiya (talk) 23:21, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, these do have articles: Mukesh (singer), Jayaprakash Narayan, Bal Thakre, Satyendra Nath Bose How can people who are so famous not have an article? Provided the spelling is right. Malaiya (talk) 23:28, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- I'm quite sure Munshi Premchand, Subhas Chandra Bose were Kayasthas. What do you need? (No, I cannnot get a notarized declaration from them stating that they are Kayastha).Malaiya (talk) 23:28, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Ironic: Real Kayasthas excluded and non-Kayasthas included
There have been quite a few Kayasthas of distinction. Unfortunately most of them had been excluded for reasons that seem quite frivolous. A few are included now, but most are still excluded.
Which is indeed ironic because the editors of the article have insisted on including a non-Kayastha Raja Todarmal, well known to have been a Khatri. A groups that includes India's first president Dr. Rajendra Prasad, the best known Hindu monk of recent times Swami Vivekanada and a national revolutionary Subhas Chandra Bose does not need a really need a Mughal courtier, specially one who was certainly not a Kayasth.
Some of the oldest known references to Kayasthas are specifically excluded because they happened to have been Buddhist. On the other hand the article dwells quite a bit on supposed questionable descent from Brahmins. For all that the Kayasthas have achieved, it is not necessary at all to claim descent from a "higher" caste.
Some of the active editors like Sitush, are unfamiliar with the Indian society, and thus can hardly be blamed. However some of them like Ekdalian are apparently Indian and presumably Kayasth. That is ironic. One would expect them to know. Malaiya (talk) 00:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Malaiya, please note that there is NO intentional bias here. Statement(s) you want to incorporate must be reliably sourced and relevant, that's all. Regarding notables, a standard is being followed, that there should be valid references referring to them as Kayasthas. And I have not introduced the same. And for your information, there are other editors involved as well. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 07:48, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Discussion on current version of this Article https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kayastha&oldid=618943617
Pros of this version:
1. Discusses the family tree and various sub-castes which were missing in the previous ones.
2. Enumerates some of the very prominent Kayastha like Kashmiri King Lalitaditya.
3. Draws authority from various religious sources as well as secular ones like Kalhana's Rajatarangini.
4. Gives authentic refs. to various books including Shloka no. and chapters.
5. Gives a general description of traditions and customs.
6. List of Kayastha much more elaborate and representative of the achievements.
7. Deals with various sub-groups different social and ethnic diversity within the Kayastha umbrella caste.
8. Better than previous version which was weakly written and lacked information and references about the caste.
9. Though it draws too much from myths yet this is very relevant as caste are derived so in India with not much scientific laws to guide such things.
1. Looks much like mythological fiction at a few places.
2. Pro- Kayastha bent.
3. More emphasis should have been given to secular achievers such as Dr. JC Bose, Dr. SS Bhatnagar etc.
4. Too intent on promoting Kayasthas as Brahmins.
5. The section "other information" not written objectively.
6. Dead references.
 does not cite secondary sources for claims of Kayastha origins at the Puranas, Smritis and Shrutis. The referenced historical "Origins" and "History" of Kayasthas are removed. WP:RS are removed and non-RS like  and  are used. "Unfortunate case of the Kayasthas of Bengal" are pure WP:POV and WP:OR. "Prominent Kayasthas", "The Family Tree" and "Origin legends" are completely devoid any references.Redtigerxyz Talk 10:21, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Dear Sir, here is the reference. The Kayastha ethnology, an enquiry into the origin of the Chitraguptavansi and Chandrasenavansi Kayasthas, compiled by K. Prasad [Published 1877] http://books.google.co.in/books?id=AH0IAAAAQAAJ&pg=PP9&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=2#v=onepage&q&f=false --का.शि.. Kayastha Shiromani , The Second. (talk) 10:40, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- I have reverted your massive addition yet again, in accordance with Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
- You were bold, and made a revision. That revision was then reverted. It is at that point that the discussion takes place, when we are back at the "original" version, not after you have repeated your change.
- The version before your mass changes was 21 kilobytes and had 38 references (one reference for every 550 bytes). Your version has 48 kilobytes and 12 references - one reference for every 4000 bytes. You have, therefore, deleted 70% of the references and added vast amounts of totally unreferenced material.
- Moreover, your version is not written in an encyclopedic style and does not comply to Wikipedia's manual of style and other policies
- Changes should be made incrementally, not en-masse, as editors have no way of accepting some changes, and rejecting others, whilst they all need references to reliable, independent sources. - Arjayay (talk) 10:42, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
@Arajay.... firstly, this is not my version. It was one of the most stable versions on Kayastha. The reference provided exhaustive and most of them are with in the article itself like the one to various source books. See the pros and cons mentioned above. I am not to deny that it needs a little cleaning up but it certainly is a superior version to the last one. I have done this considering the massive edit warring in the last few days and it seems I too have involved my self too much... talk about intentions. --का.शि.. Kayastha Shiromani , The Second. (talk) 10:58, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- This is an utter travesty of an article. If you think it's acceptable I suggest you spend some time looking at how other articles are structured and sourced. WP:GA has a good list of examples. --NeilN talk to me 14:43, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2014
|This edit request has been answered. Set the
Amitabh Bachchan who is the pioneer of hindi cinema is a Kayastha from Uttar Pradesh which is the hub of Kayatha community.
- Not done It is unclear exactly what you want to add and you have also provided no sources. --NeilN talk to me 22:49, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 14 August 2014
|This edit request has been answered. Set the
I would like to request to change the population of Kayasthas to 10 million which is incorrectly given as 8 lacs at the end of this article under modern india subheading 188.8.131.52 (talk) 09:53, 14 August 2014 (UTC)