Talk:Khufu and Khafre

Khufu[edit]

> "block ciphers typically have much smaller keys, rarely exceeding 128 bits"

This should rather say "block ciphers typically HAD much smaller keys AT THE TIME KHUFU WAS DEVELOPED, rarely exceeding 128 bits" 83.64.176.129 07:46, 13 July 2006 (UTC) Michael Noisternig[reply]

Note to anyone intending on splitting off a section[edit]

This page has been processed by N-Bot, which, for browsing convenience, changes links to redirects to lists to links to the relevant list sections: e.g. [[Khufu \(cipher\)]] is changed to [[Khufu and Khafre#Khufu|Khufu \(cipher\)]].

As a result, anyone who intends to split a section out of this page should be aware that, as of 2 November 2005, the following sections were linked to from the following pages:

~~ N-Bot (t/c) 23:56, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Khufu and Khafre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110515085818/http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~albi/fse99idea.ps.gz to http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~albi/fse99idea.ps.gz

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:46, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]