Talk:Kolel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Talk:Kollel)
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Judaism (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Missing the History of Kollelim[edit]

The history of Kollelim in the Holy land which where supported by the European Jewery, divided by Regions is Missing. One should fill in correct histroy about Polish Kollel, Hongarian, Zibnbirgen, etc.

Etymology[edit]

The word "kollel" seems to me to be the same as the English word "college". Is it an old Hebrew word or did it come into Hebrew from a Germanic source, perhaps via Yiddish? Roger (talk) 14:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but this is not true. Kollel is a known Hebrew word with the definition explained at Kollel (disambiguation).HagiMalachi (talk) 18:27, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
You're not really answering my question. Maybe "College" came into English from Hebrew (via Latin "Collegium" of course) The similarity is just too close for there to be no relationship at all! Roger (talk) 22:32, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
It's unlikely. The word "Kollel" came into use in its current sense only a few hundred years ago, I believe. My Latin is for all intents and purposes nonexistent, but still, I can't see Latin over the past few hundred years borrowing words from Hebrew. These two words happen to have some phonetic similarity but share no common linguistic ground. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.68.53.243 (talk) 11:39, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Listing of Kollel's[edit]

perhaps putting up an extensive list of kollels around the world is in order? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Waky02 (talkcontribs) 11:15, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

-) there's literally thousands, with new small ones each day. Perhaps a list could be made of the more established and/or noteworthy ones, but maybe that would be a security risk??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.110.57.234 (talk) 18:55, 12 December 2009 (UTC)


Requested move 09 July 2014[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move per request, based on none of the discussion below. What one dictionary says is meager evidence, and we should give very little weight to a raw Google web search, which does not tend to concentrate reliable sources, nor is anecdotal evidence swaying proof. We do attempt to see what a preponderance of reliable English language sources use. Here, the results of a targeted Google Books search indicates that Kolel is significantly more common in reliable English language sources.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:24, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


KollelKolel – correct spelling according to Webster's Third New International Dictionary, unabridged (1986) ISBN 0-87779-201-1 page 1254. -- -- -- 23:04, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
  • Support, because that's the way I've seen it in old texts like the Jewish Encyclopedia and also on old signs around Jerusalem (where whole neighborhoods were built by kolels). On Google, however, it looks like Kollel gets twice as many ghits as Kolel. Yoninah (talk) 19:14, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
    • I don't think it makes any sense to give Google more credence than Webster's Dictionary. -- -- -- 22:30, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:
  • That depends on how closely you transcribe the pointed Hebrew spelling, if the first ל has a dagesh. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:00, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
    • No. The ל does not have a dagesh. -- -- -- 22:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.