Talk:Krishna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article Krishna was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
October 13, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
November 6, 2008 Peer review Reviewed
March 1, 2013 Good article reassessment Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Religion (Rated B-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Hinduism / Mythology / Vaishnavism / Krishnaism / Swaminarayan (Rated B-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Hindu mythology (marked as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Vaishnavism (marked as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Krishnaism (marked as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Swaminarayan (marked as Top-importance).
 
WikiProject Biography (Rated B-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject India (Rated B-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Mythology (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team / v0.7 / Vital
WikiProject icon This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
Taskforce icon
This article has been selected for Version 0.7 and subsequent release versions of Wikipedia.
 
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is a vital article.

Accessibility to Outsiders[edit]

I can’t help but feel that this entry is written for people who know the topic better than I do. From a know-nothing outsider’s viewpoint, there are so many unknown references initially that I fear many would give up before getting the gist of who Krishna is. Shouldn’t the first paragraph be broad general information that anyone can understand? Try to clear your educated mind and consider this phrase from the perspective of an outsider: “…and is also listed in the 24 Keshava Namas of Lord Vishnu which are recited and praised at the beginning of all Vedic pujas.” It is wonderful to delve into the very deepest most obscure detail but initially I believe you must deal with a broad spectrum, dictionary like definition which eliminates all other unknowns (not commonly known)– that is if this information is to be accessible to outsiders. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.215.186.125 (talk) 15:46, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Later life[edit]

is there any verifiable basis for Gandhari's curse? If so, why does the later life not talk about this? 98.206.68.196 (talk)tkul....

Krishna belonged to Abhira (Ahir) Tribe.[edit]

http://books.google.co.in/books?id=P3uD22Ghqs4C&pg=PA197&dq=krishna+was+abhira&hl=en&ei=NTuQTdpSwp1xxJTVlQo&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CEsQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=krishna%20was%20abhira&f=false

Indian sociology through Ghurye, a dictionary By S. Devadas Pillaipage -197

Epilogue of Mahabharata http://books.google.co.in/books?id=fmzXAAAAMAAJ&q=krishna+was+abhira&dq=krishna+was+abhira&hl=en&ei=NTuQTdpSwp1xxJTVlQo&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CEEQ6AEwBA

http://books.google.co.in/books?id=voLXAAAAMAAJ&q=krishna+was+abhira&dq=krishna+was+abhira&hl=en&ei=NTuQTdpSwp1xxJTVlQo&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=0CFQQ6AEwCA Krishna Leela theme in Rajasthani miniatures


http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=aD2QTbWFJcLMcL7FnYYK&ct=result&id=qZvWAAAAMAAJ&dq=krishna+was+abhira&q=abhira http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=aD2QTbWFJcLMcL7FnYYK&ct=result&id=qZvWAAAAMAAJ&dq=krishna+was+abhira&q=abhiras Hinduism and Buddhism: an historical sketch, Volume 1 By Sir Charles Eliot

http://books.google.co.in/books?id=kMnOBpUy7P4C&pg=PA158&dq=krishna+was+abhira&hl=en&ei=aD2QTbWFJcLMcL7FnYYK&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEIQ6AEwBTgU#v=onepage&q&f=false Hindu Gods and Heroes http://books.google.co.in/books?id=_r1buuxthXoC&pg=PA97&dq=krishna+was+abhira&hl=en&ei=VD-QTZagH8qycMXUmYsK&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCgQ6AEwADge#v=onepage&q=krishna%20was%20abhira&f=false

Ahir king Nand Baba and Vasudeva were brothers.[edit]

The cattle and the stick: an ethnographic profile of the Raut of Chhattisgarh

http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=VD-QTZagH8qycMXUmYsK&ct=result&id=wT-BAAAAMAAJ&dq=krishna+was+abhira&q=yaduvansi

Krishna's last words[edit]

According to this article, Krishna says, moments before his death to the hunter who has attacked him by mistake, the following: "O Jara, you were Vaali in your previous birth, killed by myself as Rama in Tretayuga. Here you had a chance to even it and since all acts in this world are done as desired by me, you need not worry for this".

I tried going through the references (83-85). One of them brings me back to this page, one of them links me to Ganguli's translation in which this is not mentioned, and the third is not accessible. Neither the Itihasa (of Mahabharata) nor the Puranas say that Jara is Vali. In fact, many scholars of Ramayana opine that Vali got moksha, which means that he did not take birth as Jara.

For this reason, I'm removing the above quoted sentence. If anybody has a concrete evidence, they can re-add the sentence along with the citation. 59.184.165.226 (talk) 08:43, 29 August 2013 (UTC)Raghav Sharman

Astrological dating[edit]

I checked some of the last reverts of this page, this one[1], I agree with this edit, but, remembering that it's just a astrological view, i think we can still insert this way:-

"Based on scriptural details and astrological calculations the date of Krishna's birth, known as Janmashtami,[1] is 21 July 3228 BCE.[2][3]"

I hope it will work. Bladesmulti (talk) 10:45, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

I am not opposed to including traditional dates for Krishna's birth, if there was/were such date(s) generally accepted by scholarly sources. But as the Outlook article you cite above shows, these dates are a dime a dozen, and almost universally rejected/ignored by actual scholars. As for the book by Frank Marcello Antonetti, it is a self-published fringe work by a person with no publication record in the area and not a reliable source. We can find dozens of such new age/fringe publications on google books, which while convenient, should not be used for sourcing an article on a subject covered by numerous scholarly journal articles and books published by university and academic presses. Abecedare (talk) 10:59, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Let's see, if i have found better sources. What about these ones,[2] <<- Times of India, [3] by B V Raman, [4], [5], [6], [7], Maybe not date but the year can be added if tried. Bladesmulti (talk) 11:15, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately, not a single of those is a reliable source. If you think otherwise for any particular source, we can discuss it here on at WP:RSN. In general: it is abetter idea to read the best available sources on a topic and then try to summarize their contents on wikipedia; starting with (often dubious) wikipedia content, and then trying to find sources is often fraught with perils, as in this case. Abecedare (talk) 11:27, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
WP RSN may help, but only when more people would look forward in this regard. No hurries, can be done whenever other editors take interest here. Bladesmulti (talk) 11:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)