Talk:Krrish 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Film (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.
 

Correct budget[edit]

I am User:AniceMathew...Koimoi has stated that the budget is approximately 115 crore-120 crore rupees. So its either 1.15 billion or 1.2 billion....decide which one..@User:Sohambanerjee1998

Krrish 2 or Krrish 3?[edit]

  • What's the working title of the movie. Multiple sources such as [1] [2] are saying Krrish 3 and other sources say Krrish 2? Is there any official source for this?---Managerarctalk 18:25, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
  • I believe its Krrish 2 only because in KMG, Hrithik's character was Rohit and not Krrish. Hungama claims it as Krrish 2 only and ImDb follows a similar claim. :) Secret of success (Talk) 05:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Let it be Krrish 2 right now. Will change the name when any official announcement is done. ASHUIND 04:52, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Its officially declared and announced now that its Krrish 3 by the star Hrithik Roshan himself. See this. Hrithik says "Actually it is Krrish 3, because first was Koi Mil Gaya (2003), then Krrish (2006) and now Krrish 3. There was a Hollywood film First Blood, then came Rambo and then it was Rambo 3." Hope we can now move the article to Krrish 3. --Msrag (talk) 10:11, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
  • No! I am totally against moving it unless the official site of the film, which will come soon, says too. Remember Don 2, so much of revert warring is useless. X.One SOS 13:15, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
  • It's Krrish 2 and not Krrish 3 as far as my concern. Wait for the official site of the film, or else atleast till the film's promotional activities kick's off. -- Karthik Nadar 13:22, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Oh boy. There is already a page called Krrish 3. So now there will need to be some kind of merge, because they are progressing independently. BollyJeff || talk 13:24, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
  • This talk page is the same, but the main pages are different; see Krrish 2 and Krrish 3. Can someone please fix this? BollyJeff || talk 01:39, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Its worth a redirect but still all info which is present there and not here in Krrish 2 should be moved so that nothing is lost. The reason for redirect is that Krrish 2 and Krrish 3 have received equal mention in all reliable sources, including a word from an insider of the film. But as the name change will result in edit warring and useless disputes, as you guys have had in Don 2, both can be given a chance. Users searching for Krrish 2 and 3 will land up in the same place intended. So, I hope someone can move all necessary info back here. Cheers. X.One SOS 14:25, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
  • I have redirected the page to Krrish 2. Regards. X.One SOS 13:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
  • At 05:45, 16 January 2012‎ User:Debarshisharma cut-and-pasted Krrish 2 to Krrish 3, but at 05:56, 16 January 2012‎ User:Calabe1992 reverted it in Krrish 2, changing it into a copy-and-paste, and since then both versions have been edited much. Currently there are long parallel editing histories at Krrish 2 and Krrish 3, and at 11:58, 16 April 2012‎ Krrish 2 was redirected to Krrish 3. Someone will have to decide which of the two to keep, or will have to text-merge them. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:00, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 16 June 2013[edit]

223.176.107.51 (talk) 08:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC) This photo is not official.

Source? Alternate photo? X mark.svg Not done for now. Please provide a source and an "official photo". Thanks! Jguy TalkDone 00:58, 19 June 2013 (UTC)


Edit request on 24 June 2013[edit]

Add official website to references http://www.krrish-3.com/ Manas ku2005 (talk) 11:49, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Already done in "External links" section. Begoontalk 01:47, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 7 July 2013[edit]

Synopsis[edit]

After defeating the villainous Dr. Siddhant Arya, and bringing his father Rohit back from the dead, Krrish continued fighting against evil and saving innocent lives.Now Krishna is living a happily married life with Priya, while Rohit is using his scientific brilliance to benefit society. And Krrish is everyone’s favorite superhero saviour.Unknown to them, a dark force is growing in another part of the world. Kaal, an evil genius, is selfishly misusing his powers to spread fear, death and destruction. And he is being assisted by an army of very dangerous beings, which he has created himself.Not long after Kaal’s plans are put into action, both Rohit and Krrish find themselves faced with a crisis of epic proportions, which only they can resolve, together. But when they finally cross paths with Kaal and his army, neither of them is prepared for what lies ahead. Kaal not only brings the world to the brink of disaster, he also puts the strength and love of Krishna and his family to the test.And Krrish has to somehow find the power within to face an unbeatable foe.The greatest battle between good and evil begins…. Krutik118 (talk) 06:09, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Not done: appears to be copied verbatim from [3], among others. Please note WP:PLAGIARISM and WP:COPYVIO. Thanks, NiciVampireHeart 10:11, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 7 July 2013[edit]

Synopsis[edit]

After defeating the villainous Dr. Siddhant Arya, and bringing his father Rohit back from the dead, Krrish continued fighting against evil and saving innocent lives.Now Krishna is living a happily married life with Priya, while Rohit is using his scientific brilliance to benefit society. And Krrish is everyone’s favorite superhero saviour.Unknown to them, a dark force is growing in another part of the world. Kaal, an evil genius, is selfishly misusing his powers to spread fear, death and destruction. And he is being assisted by an army of very dangerous beings, which he has created himself.Not long after Kaal’s plans are put into action, both Rohit and Krrish find themselves faced with a crisis of epic proportions, which only they can resolve, together. But when they finally cross paths with Kaal and his army, neither of them is prepared for what lies ahead. Kaal not only brings the world to the brink of disaster, he also puts the strength and love of Krishna and his family to the test.And Krrish has to somehow find the power within to face an unbeatable foe.The greatest battle between good and evil begins…. Krutik118 (talk) 06:09, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done- wait til film gets released and also that this synopsis is copied from other websites. Tolly4bolly 09:29, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 18 July 2013[edit]

Synopsis[edit]

After defeating the villainous Dr. Siddhant Arya, and bringing his father Rohit back from the dead, Krrish continued fighting against evil and saving innocent lives.Now Krishna is living a happily married life with Priya, while Rohit is using his scientific brilliance to benefit society. And Krrish is everyone’s favorite superhero saviour.Unknown to them, a dark force is growing in another part of the world. Kaal, an evil genius, is selfishly misusing his powers to spread fear, death and destruction. And he is being assisted by an army of very dangerous beings, which he has created himself.Not long after Kaal’s plans are put into action, both Rohit and Krrish find themselves faced with a crisis of epic proportions, which only they can resolve, together. But when they finally cross paths with Kaal and his army, neither of them is prepared for what lies ahead.

Kaal not only brings the world to the brink of disaster, he also puts the strength and love of Krishna and his family to the test.And Krrish has to somehow find the power within to face an unbeatable foe.The greatest battle between good and evil begins…. 14.140.19.35 (talk) 07:56, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Not done: for the same reasons cited in the two previous edit requests. 786b6364 (talk) 10:12, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 5 October 2013[edit]

Template:Edit public

27.251.133.66 (talk) 08:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 11 October 2013[edit]

The film poster can be renewed as there is a poster released with all the antagonists couple of days ago. 39.42.71.123 (talk) 14:24, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Note: The {{edit semi-protected}} template requires a more detailed request. Editors interested in this article will see your suggestion even without the template and may find it useful. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 15:32, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Budget - 250 crore[edit]

Krrish 3 budget is 250 crore as per official poster. Source - https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BWeYGILCQAAcxDP.jpg:large

Not done: Your request should include the text you want to add and where exactly you want to add it. In this case, though, the source seems unreliable for the information, being a detail mentioned as part of an advertisement. Please find a reliable source. Independent, secondary sources are the best. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 15:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 25 October 2013[edit]

Video Songs Download - Bolly24x7.com Bolly24x7 (talk) 08:02, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. Unimportant for inclusion in the article as well as might be spam. No context whatsoever as well as meaningful impact on the article. Sohambanerjee1998 08:40, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Krrish 3 Box Office Report[edit]

this link should be added to provide latest information regarding Krrish 3 response on Box Office


X mark.svg Not done, unreliable source. Sohambanerjee1998 16:05, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Krrish 3 has received positive reviews from critics and public, its budget is 115 cr.... not 30cr...[edit]

what the hell is this? wiki is supposed to be the mirror of truth and it is showing these kinds of fake figures?

its budget is 115 cr above ...... who dared to edit it and show it as 30 cr? he should be jailed.

and the film has received mostly negative reviews.... from critics as well as public ...

who dared to show it as positive?

Are there no administrators to control these kinds of mega frauds? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.96.253.214 (talk) 05:26, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Many of the noted and professional reviewers rated it with either positive .1.5 out of 5 star has been considered negative which is not the case with film anywhere on reliable website.Where do you get all the stuff from?You are liable to be blocked for legal threat or abusive language.---zeeyanwiki discutez 09:50, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

cast[edit]

Gowhar Khan played Striker in the movie you can check the movie credits

120.62.36.132 (talk) 09:28, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Two things -
  1. Which Gowhar Khan? Gauhar Khan - this?
  2. Source? 866ƖǝǝɾɹǝuɐqɯɐɥoS 09:31, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Krrish 3 - 5/5 review on SocialDhabba[edit]

Krrish 3 - 5/5 review on SocialDhabba Micks80 (talk) 19:15, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Not done: please make your request in a "change X to Y" format. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 02:59, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Content removals[edit]

AniceMathew please discuss before removing content here as that is considered as vandalism and I dont want to label you as a Vandal. Soham Banerjee 09:37, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Please again discuss here.   Sohambanerjee1998   16:26, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Controversy section[edit]

The case was rejected by the court. Giving permanent importance to certain person named 'Uday Singh Rajput' only because of short time and minor controversy is WP:UNDUE. I have removed 'controversy' section. Abhi (talk) 14:38, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Yep was necessary. Soham Banerjee 15:16, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Box office collection[edit]

Multiple reliable sources are giving box office collection of Krrish 3. Some are updated until yesterday[5][6][7], some are few days old[8][9] but still give higher collection figures than User:Sohambanerjee1998 is trying to insert in infobox with his only source of boxofficeindia.com. I request user to point out how the Financial Express and other sources given above are unreliable. Abhi (talk) 14:29, 10 November 2013 (UTC) Also I note that 'Box office' section has used only one source i.e boxofficeindia.com to write entire section which is giving wrong figures. Multiple reliable sources are completely ignored. I am removing this one sided POV info. Abhi (talk) 14:41, 10 November 2013 (UTC)500 crore total net worldwide.

First of all,there is no need to insert figures in infobox until worlwide gross will be updated,@Abhi,How can you term these figures are wrong?No website is official tracker and yes all reliable sources have equal preference.On one side we simply try to ignore websites like Koimoi and Bollywoodhungama because both of them belong to analysts having link with bollywood and we may get biased figures from there.e.g. Koimoi updated Chennai express collections as high as 422 cr but no other single reliable newspaper does so.On the other hand,we cant ignore national newspapers like financial express and economic times.So instead of redundant discussion you may add approximate figures of reliable newspapers in other paragraph.Mutual cooperation is better option.I am busy now but explain you latter with key points and comments of other established editors why we have been using boxofficeindia.com.Till then keep up!Good Luck---zeeyanwiki discutez 18:36, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Oh Zee, this the reason probably you are one of the best! I completely agree with the user.   Sohambanerjee1998   18:49, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Boxoffice india figures are only reliable source. Second choice in Box office india trade magazine. Producers figures through paid trade analysts and newspaper are fake and used for publicity to increase film business. Indicine who was first displaying producers figure has given a very good insight on this controversy. Macedonish (talk) 17:00, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────A perfect example why it is hard to believe in boxoffice figures provided by Producers and trade analysts.See here.So for more NPOV i think it's better to stick around with Boxofficeindia.com.---zeeyanwiki discutez 05:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Controversial box office collections ₯€¥৳[edit]

not fair...you guys are only showing boxofficeindia.com's figures...and everyone knows that the site is outdated..they always keep changing figures from their own figures so how can they be accurate?? whereas all the other major sites are showing higher figures including all the tv channels...even big newspapers like TOI etc are showing higher figures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.205.162.152 (talk) 16:31, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Its a WP:CONSENSUS to use it! What everyone knows does not matter in an encyclopaedia, reliable sources does. Sohambanerjee1998 17:18, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
(e/c)we go with the most reliable sources available, and community consensus has determined that generally BOI is appropriately reliable. if you have evidence of anyone who is widely acknowledged more reliable, please put them forward. If you have multiple reliable sources that conflict with BOI on this particular piece of data, WP:UNDUE, depending upon the source(s), we can include all major perspectives. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:32, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Where is 'consensus' link? We follow WP:NPOV and quote different views from WP:RS as I have mentioned in above section. I don't have time, otherwise I would have followed this matter in RSN, DRN etc. This article is blatant POV of 2-3 users. Abhi (talk) 15:33, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
What will you pursue [right term to use] since there is no dispute at all. Plus refrain from making Personal attacks, blame of POV is a serious issue, even though you have not named the users. Sohambanerjee1998 16:20, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 28 November 2013[edit]

KIRAN12688 (talk) 08:47, 28 November 2013 (UTC) Kriish 3 becomes the highest grosser in bollywood in india collecting 242.82 cr surpassing chennai express 227.13 cr[1]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 03:14, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Krish 3 collections as per Bollywood Hungama and other leading box office reporters[edit]

As per the respected Trade Analyst Taran Adarsh and other leading Bollywood trade analysts, Krish 3 collected 255 million on opening day, and the domestic total of Krish 3 is inclusive of Hindi + Tamil + Telugu versions after 20 days of run is 2432.4 million and hence holds the highest net grosser of all time of Bollywood [2] Purna bisoi (talk) 10:09, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

A user came with this source previously and got rejected. It's unreliable source. So I'm closing this request as X mark.svg Not done for now. --Pratyya (Hello!) 14:16, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Please remove biased statements...[edit]

Can someone please remove the statements saying that Rakesh Roshan was lying about collections? There is no proof that he is telling lies, and the articles you cite are counting on "inside sources", none of which are named. Plus, none of those sources support the claims you make that Roshan has been giving gross collections instead of net. He himself said the film has grossed over 500 crores, so why is someone as biased as Ashermadan allowed to make edits? Aobero874 (talk) 01:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Not done: please make your request in a "change X to Y" format. I can see nothing in the article which resembles your complaint. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 04:01, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

WP:STRUCTURE[edit]

Is there agreement that there is a benefit to the encyclopedia by the article violating WP:STRUCTURE by calling out in a separate section a "controversy" rather than integrating it into the main body of the article? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Look at the articles Jab Tak Hai Jaan and Parasakthi (1952 film) (both are GA's). Don't they have controversy sections? They passed their GA reviews while having the controversy sections, and those were not questioned at all! ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 12:47, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
and i can point you to dozens of GA and FA film articles that don't have sections that violate WP:STRUCTURE. What does this article gain from calling out this incident in a full section in violation of the policy? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:51, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 January 2014[edit]

please add Anupam Kher as one of Kaal's Scientistes in the cast section. 109.151.77.221 (talk) 16:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

He is not Anupam Kher, he is his brother Raju Kher. Both look alike to some extent. Haven't seen movie, so don't know how big was the role. Let some one else decide. Abhi (talk) 17:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 September 2014[edit]

All the links and references from boxofficeindia.com are not working.Its a normal observation boxofficeindia removes the pages. Its better use boxofficeindia.co.in as referance where collection history pages are not removed. 122.167.177.93 (talk) 13:57, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now:You'll need to supply the links they are to be changed to. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 02:47, 4 September 2014 (UTC)