Talk:Kuzushi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removal of Diagram[edit]

Removed for a couple of reasons the main one being that its a copy of an opinion given here and therefore qualifies as original research (http://judoforum.com/index.php?showtopic=15482) if not copyright violation (even if the same person entered both).

It applies to a very specific situation and not kuzushi in general and in isolation it gives the mistaken impression that this is what kuzushi is and how it is best applied. It is quite different from the general consensus.

The feet placement described has some merit when describing lines of weakness but both people are at equal disadvantage and hence it comes down to a contest of strength and flexibility. Its a great training game for developing the "kuzushi feel"- I'm inspired to use it tonight but it does miss the idea of advantageous body placement.Peter Rehse 04:16, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Judo bias[edit]

The article implies that kuzushi is a judo concept. I wonder if there is a good source for that? The concept is used in wider aikido circles than only Shodokan, and Wado Ryu karate is to my knowledge not very influenced by judo. I could be wrong, but to my mind it seems this statement is incorrect. Maybe it is better to divide the article into several parts, one more general and one about kuzushi in judo. Otherwise I fear this article will always be in a state of struggle between judo bias and tries to get rid of judo bias. // habj 20:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right - neither Aikido nor Wado Ryu was influenced by Judo. Rather, all three were developed from Ju Jitsu (Wado being a hybrid of Ju Jitsu and Shotokan Karate). So it's likely that the emphasis on kuzushi in all three arts derives from Ju Jitsu. I'll hunt out a reliable source for this. DCTEN (talk) 13:30, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done - I've amended the article as above with a reference to Eddie Ferrie's 'Ju Jitsu Classical and Modern'. DCTEN (talk) 21:58, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kuzushi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kuzushi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:07, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]