Talk:Lai Chi Wo

Classification as "walled village"

Some sources call Lai Chi Wo a "walled village", but it does not seem to have the characteristics (past or present) to qualify as such like others in Hong Kong. If it is actually one, please indicate the source and explain why it is or was a walled village. Thank you. olivier (talk) 10:02, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

There are feng shui walls, but not really protective walls, which would make (or have made) the village be a little fortress, as the term "walled village would imply. You can have a look at this article for background [1]. olivier (talk) 10:15, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

The 2 sources given in the article for supporting the "walled village" classification are: 1) a webpage dedicated to Camping Sites and 2) a report assembled by students of the School of Hotel and Tourism Management. More scholarly sources and some reasons for the classification should be given. Documents from the Antiquities and Monuments Office, for instance, do not refer to the village as a "walled village". olivier (talk) 10:37, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

The 3rd source, here, which is on the website of the Hong Kong Tourism Board says: "First stop is Lai Chi Wo, an island featuring a Hakka walled village". So they call Lai Chi Wo an "island" (!!!). Well, no big deal I guess, but it disqualifies the page completely as a reliable source. To date, I still haven't seen it called a "walled village" in any reliable source, although yes, it is a village with feng shui walls. olivier (talk) 08:46, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Lai Chi Wo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130929084031/http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/country/cou_vis/cou_vis_cou/cou_vis_cou_pc/cou_vis_cou_pc.html to http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/country/cou_vis/cou_vis_cou/cou_vis_cou_pc/cou_vis_cou_pc.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110709224215/http://www.amo.gov.hk/form/historical.pdf to http://www.amo.gov.hk/form/historical.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091027031339/http://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/english/environmentinhk/eia_planning/sea/annex_b.html to http://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/english/environmentinhk/eia_planning/sea/annex_b.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090910023157/http://eco.org.hk/article-nature-lcw.html to http://www.eco.org.hk/article-nature-lcw.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130922201512/http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/ce/Museum/Monument/form/Brief_Information_on_proposed_Grade_III_Items.pdf to http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/ce/Museum/Monument/form/Brief_Information_on_proposed_Grade_III_Items.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://web.archive.org/web/20120211131238/http%3A//www.ofta.gov.hk/en/ca_bd/country_map/OFTA-68.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Lai Chi Wo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090929095136/http://www.discoverhongkong.com/usa/local-tours/outlying-northeast-new-territories.html to http://www.discoverhongkong.com/usa/local-tours/outlying-northeast-new-territories.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091008030410/http://www.mapasia.com/ecology/view19.htm to http://www.mapasia.com/ecology/view19.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091010072025/http://www.news.gov.hk/tc/category/environment/041215/html/041215tc04001.htm to http://www.news.gov.hk/tc/category/environment/041215/html/041215tc04001.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726190636/http://www.hiking-in-hong-kong.co.uk/hiking-trail/north-new-territories/nature-trail/lai-chi-wo-nature-trail/area/21/index.html to http://www.hiking-in-hong-kong.co.uk/hiking-trail/north-new-territories/nature-trail/lai-chi-wo-nature-trail/area/21/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110124001525/http://www.geopark.gov.hk/en_geopark3g2.html to http://www.geopark.gov.hk/en_geopark3g2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:53, 15 December 2017 (UTC)