This article is within the scope of WikiProject King Arthur, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of King Arthur, the Arthurian era and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This is an important page, but it contains inaccuracies. For example, Micha's 8 volumes do not contain the cycle of 5 romances, but only the Lancelot Proper (3rd of the 5). And Lacy's volumes, listed as critical editions, are instead translations. Njl2 11:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
This does need a lot of work, sadly, over the whole spectrum. But while the NJL (hmm...:) ) translation should perhaps not be called a "scholarly edition", I'd like to note it's acceptible to use as a reference. It's the best English version I know of, and certainly the most comprehensive.--Cúchullaint/c 18:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Well, the recent Pléiade edition is the complete cycle, yet someone has seen fit to remove it from the bibliography.
Would anyone like to try their hand at summarizing the contents of this work as well as the Post-Vulgate and Prose Tristan? Perhaps with a discussion of their sources and authorship? We could possibly split up the task if anyone is interested. I know there are some articles on JStor about the scholarship behind the cycles. Phi (talk) 17:29, 23 April 2015 (UTC)