Talk:Langue nouvelle

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Constructed languages Low‑importance

	Constructed languages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WikiProject Constructed languagesconstructed language articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Influence on other projects[edit]

Nice article, I admit I had never heard of this project. One question though: the sentence "It is likely that it influenced Volapuk, Esperanto, and other language projects of the 19th century" strikes me as a somewhat bold claim. Are there any sources out there to substantiate it? —IJzeren Jan _Uszkiełtu? 08:19, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's from the WP-eo article, where it's tagged for sourcing, but at Esperanto etymology we do have a comment from Otto Jespersen that the vowel ablaut of Esperanto was not original to Zamenhof, but dates back to Faiguet. — kwami (talk) 08:23, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's interesting and certainly worth mentioning in the article, but IMO it's not a strong case for any influence. Vowel ablaut in Volapük and Esperanto may just as well be attributed to coindicence, especially since the idea is not exactly far-fetched. If we don't even know that Zamenhof and Schleyer were familiar with this project at all, I don't think it would be wise to suggest any direct influence. —IJzeren Jan _Uszkiełtu? 09:15, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jesperson was suggesting an influence, if not directly then perhaps through intermediate projects. Faiguet published his sketch in the most famous encyclopedia of the era, so it wasn't as obscure then as it is now. — kwami (talk) 10:32, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]