Talk:Lasca

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Board and table games (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
 


Башни[edit]

Most probably, Lasker just has adapted old Russian game of Bashni(Towers, Башни) also known as Stolbovye shashki (Столбовые шашки. lit."draughts with pillars". The Russian game is played as a variant of Russian checkers(8x8 board, men capture backwards, kings are long-range) and in a book printed in 1875 it was already mentioned as an old and well-known game (see Башни или туры//Сборник игр для семьи и школы. Ред.Вал.Висковатов. Издание А.Черкесов и Ко, 1875 г. С.Петербург.) Pre-existence of the game in Russia could also be palpable in a tradition to represent a king piece in regular checkers as a man turned up side down and not by covering it with another piece. -- unsigned by User:AgnosticMantis at 11:26, 24 November 2007

I agree. Before reading the previous note, I had already added a sentence about the connection with Bashni. Also, added a reference to an article in German which seems to have the best up-to-date scholarship on Laska. I hope this is appropriate for en:

--Noerdosnum (talk) 17:57, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Image descriptions[edit]

I tried to put the captions into better english. While doing that I noticed that the caption for image 6 was unappropriate. Tried to fix that also – I hope I understood the rules correctly. If I'm right, Pic 6 should be fixed to show the additional green piece on top. --BjKa (talk) 14:14, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

No, I got it wrong. Fixed the captions so other people don't fall into the same misunderstanding. In general the pictures are really helpful, but in detail they are very badly done... --BjKa (talk) 14:46, 10 March 2015 (UTC)