Talk:Le Coq Sportif

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fashion Mid‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rewrite. Not NPOV[edit]

The whole article reads like an advertisement. It should should be done in a neutral point of view.

Suggest reverting the article back to the previous version here, the major rewrite that was done is nothing but advertising and does not belong in an encyclopaedia. If there are no objections within a few days I'll go ahead with the revert. (Simon KHFC 01:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I fully agree. The current version is nothing but advertising puffery of the highest order. The current version flouts MoS and is NPOV. Revert it now, don't wait. The info was added by anon IP 81.80.12.81 and there are no prizes for guessing what comes up when you do a WHOIS[1]check on that IP. - X201 09:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs fleshing out[edit]

I know there's a lot of history over the management and licensing of the brand - I believe Adidas was a part owner for decades before a series of sales to various investors/licensees, though I don't have the specific dates etc. 204.63.44.147 (talk) 13:14, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Le Coq Sportif. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070904111555/http://www.vogue.com.au/fashion_central/companies/fashion/le_coq_sportif to http://www.vogue.com.au/fashion_central/companies/fashion/le_coq_sportif

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:56, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Needs actual sources[edit]

I strongly believe that I had removed contentious material that is libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced from this Wiki page's sponsorship section. I had fixed misleading content; inadvertent or not. No legitimate or even any sources provided. Wisdomthroughfaith (talk) 09:04, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Serious issue regarding WP:NPOV[edit]

The section under Sponsorships, "Current sponsorsphips" and "Football" "National teams" and "Club teams" must be properly referenced especially for teams like "South Africa," "Bnei Sakhnin," "Ironi Kiryat Shmona," "PAC Giannina," "Casarano", "AS Velasca" etc.

These must be properly referenced. Again it is missing "references". Any uninvolved external editors would be highly appreciated to help handling this situation. :) Wisdomthroughfaith (talk) 20:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If sources are needed, the correct template should have been "citations needed" or "unreferences" instead of "neutrality". I've just changed it. Fma12 (talk) 00:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]