Talk:List of Lego Star Wars sets

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please Enter 10131[edit]

http://shop.lego.com/Product/?p=10131

Unleash the power of the TIE™ Collection! The Empire's most feared ships fly again in this special LEGO Star Wars™ collection! Complete set includes two Imperial TIE fighters, Darth Vader's TIE fighter, and one TIE/d fighter, plus Darth Vader minifigure, 2 Imperial TIE pilot minifigures and Droid Brain. These starship models have never before been offered together, so start building your Imperial fleet today! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.13.153 (talk) 16:23, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Darth Maul Bust 10018[edit]

THIS PAGE IS MISSING "10018 Darth Maul Bust" MY APOLOGIES FOR HAVING NO IDEA HOW TO EDIT WIKI'S, BUT CAN SOMEONE PLEASE ENTER THIS MODEL INTO THE DATABASE? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.1.163 (talk) 12:13, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Minifigure Sets[edit]

  • Are there any sources available that can confirm the minifigure sets added to this page on November 4? NighthawkLeader 09:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

False sets[edit]

  • Stop puting false sets. If this sets are true, show a picture or message of the set. Olsonman 19:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Clone Wars its own section[edit]

I believe that The Clone Wars section should be it's own section between Star Wars Episode II and III. User:Olsonman 2:51, 1 Febuary 2008

Imperial Dropship and Rebel Scout Speeder in EU[edit]

I think the Imperial Dropship and the Rebel Scout Speeder should be in Expanded Universe since it was never even saw at Episode IV. Olsonman 3:01, 4 March 2008

How about 10123 Cloud City[edit]

http://shop.lego.com/Product/?p=10123

I am not sure in which year this set is released but it is missing by the UCS of Episode V —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.95.190.118 (talk) 20:23, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clone Wars[edit]

Should we put all Clone Wars sets in an own section? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.187.228.150 (talk) 17:09, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about Magnet sets[edit]

  • Some of the magnet sets I am aware of are:
  1. 851939 - Stormtrooper, Y-wing Pilot, and AT-ST Pilot
  2. 852085 - Boba Fett, Princess Leia, and Royal Guard
  3. 852086 - Darth Maul, Anakin, and Naboo Fighter Pilot
  4. 4269242 - Chewbacca, Darth Vader, Obi-Wan Kenobi
  5. 4269244 - Yoda, Anakin Skywalker, Clone Trooper —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhepfner (talkcontribs) 13:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Keychains[edit]

  • Here are some keychains that I notice are missing.
  1. 3808 - R2-D2 Keychain
  2. 3948 - Stormtrooper Keychain
  3. 850353 - Darth Vader Keychain
  4. 850355 - Stormtrooper Keychain
  5. 851462 - Anakin Keychain
  6. 851463 - Clone Trooper Keychain
  7. 851464 - Chewbacca Keychain
  8. 851659 - Boba fett Keychain
  9. 851683 - Imperial Royal Guard Keychain
  10. 852129 - Emperor Palpatine Keychain
  11. 852347 - Shock Trooper Keychain
  12. 852348 - Rebel Trooper Keychain
  13. 852349 - Shadow Trooper Bag Charm
  14. 852350 - Clone Wars Anakin Keychain
  15. 852351 - Clone Wars Obi Wan Keychain

Sorting[edit]

I've started changing the tables over to be sortable. I'll do all the others tomorrow or the day after. Do we want to add columns or regularise the set names? I think some are not exactly what the box shows. Also, do we want to come up with a more standardised way of listing minifigs so we can make those sortable too? Grahamwest (talk) 11:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Collapse tables[edit]

I think it'd look better if the various tables for each episode were collapsed into one with either a type (Basic, Mini, Technic, UCS) or into sub-tables like the Lego Space page. I think adding type is better because then you can sort by it. Opinions? Grahamwest (talk) 22:41, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New sets[edit]

Can someone please add these 6 sets: 75006 75007 75008 75009 75010 75011 see here. Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 13:34, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars Rebels should also be added. 75.111.52.129 (talk) 03:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EU should be renamed Legends, as it has been named since Disney's takeover. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.144.164.251 (talk) 04:21, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the Rogue One sets? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:30CA:49D0:8C08:6035:E967:7B83 (talk) 02:10, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Lego Star Wars sets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:11, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Lego Star Wars sets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:51, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rogue One, Solo, Microfighters[edit]

I added all Rogue One models i know. I inserted the new section between III and IV, owing to the timeline. Some sets for Solo are already known, i'd put them between III and RO. If you want to open a new section for the anthology movies, do it. Just don't scrap my work.

What about Microfighters? Since it isn't always possible to tell which movie/series the model belongs to, should there be a complete new section for these? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GrafZahl~dewiki (talkcontribs) 11:42, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]