Talk:List of Private Practice episodes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result was: Merge, per consensus. --B. Wolterding (talk) 19:18, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


All of these plot summaries can be simply merged into one article which features the plot synopsis, casting, etc. Currently, these episodes are violating WP:IINFO. These articles usually contain a non-free image as well as pointless trivia. These pictures and trivia can be deleted and the vital information can simply be merged here in the article. σмgнgσмg 13:37, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, except I'm also going to add In Which Sam Receives an Unexpected Visitor to the list, as it is another current page for an episode. Grey's Anatomy does not usually have these kinds of pages. - Xtreme680 17:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree. All current articles for Private Practice episodes should be merged into one article featuring a list of episodes, their summaries, soundtracks, and whatever other information there may be. -Mokakeiche (talk) 22:41, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What is the point of merging only those three articles, when they are all the same. I like individual articles, but there's no point in having these ones. I like the idea of merging all the articles into one with lots of detail. Щіκі RoςкЗ(talκ) 05:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely, the articles should be merged - much like Grey's Anatomy. The plot synopsis also needs a major do-over. I did some editing, but do not have sufficient knowledge to complete it. Please, if someone knows enough about the episode, could they try to fix this article up? Sarah Sea (talk) 14:13, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There seems to be pretty much consensus for merging the episode articles into a list. In fact, the list already exists with plot summaries, so I will just redirect the articles. If anybody wants to merge more, the article history is always available. --B. Wolterding (talk) 19:17, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Season 2 episodes[edit]

Although I did not get the chance to see the articles of the episodes of season one before they were merged, I have been looking through the season two episode articles and have found that they may not be needed. The articles to consist of a plot summary, a cast list and a occasionally trivia. Important information could easily be merged into a list, while irrelevant information would be easy to delete. The arguments used in the previous merge proposal seem to apply. Opinions? Stormwhisper talk 16:38, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings[edit]

That's a LOT of ratings information. The article does not need that much. One column in the episode listing table would be plenty (total US viewers, I guess, since it's a US show). Alana scorpio (talk) 21:04, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of Private Practice episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:03, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]