Talk:List of former presidents of the United States who ran for office

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The title of this article (Former presidents who ran for the presidency) is problematic unless it is expanded to include presidents of countries other than the U.S. 165.189.91.148 19:43, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Problem solved! Page moved from Former presidents who ran for the presidency to Former U.S. presidents who ran for the U.S. presidency. --Mark Adler (Markles) 02:10, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Taft[edit]

Should we add William Howard Taft to this list, since after his presidency he went on to serve as Chief Justice? I can understand its omission because he didn't *run* for office, but nonetheless he did *take* an office and it seems relevant. Collabi 22:14, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although this really doesn't fit neatly, you could compare Taft with Charles Evans Hughes (1862-1948), a former Governor of New York who was appointed to the Supreme Court of the U.S. by Taft in 1910 as an Associate Justice, resigned in 1916 to run unsuccessfully against Pres. Wilson, and was then appointed Chief Justice by Hoover in 1930 (serving until 1941). —— Shakescene (talk) 11:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hoover and Ford[edit]

Hoover tried to get the 1940 nomination at the Republican convention that year. Ford had an exploritory committee in 1979 and got his name on the New Hampshire primary ballot methinks, but I'm not sure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.68.128.125 (talk) 19:24, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Johnson[edit]

Andrew Johnson did not run for the senate while president, as the table claims. He left the presidency in March 1869 and returned home to Tennessee, running for a Senate seat shortly thereafter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.104.104.46 (talk) 20:47, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 March 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus favors wp:concise at this time. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 09:28, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


List of United States presidents who ran for office after leaving the presidencyList of former United States presidents who ran for office – I believe this more succinct title still adequately describes the article. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC) Relisting. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • It might also be a good idea to use "U.S." instead of "United States", to be even more succinct. — BarrelProof (talk) 03:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Most U.S. presidential list articles are actually the longer "List of presidents of the United States..." Mdewman6 (talk) 03:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pinging BDD who recently moved the page to the current title to correct an even less succinct title. Mdewman6 (talk) 03:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    No strong feelings here. I restored the article per RfD, and then noticed the redundancy (was "List of United States presidents who ran for office after leaving the presidency"). --BDD (talk) 17:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – I'm worried that readers might perceive the proposed title to mean "any now-former president who ran for office at any point", as opposed to "any president who ran for office while they were a former president". Paintspot Infez (talk) 03:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I see your point, though such an interpretation would mean the list would include all the presidents, and readers should then recognize it would be an odd way to title the content at List of presidents of the United States. But I agree, perhaps this shorter version would yield just enough confusion to make it not an improvement. Mdewman6 (talk) 04:17, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Paintspot and Mdewman6: May I suggest List of then-former United States presidents who ran for office, as I believe that would have the same meaning as the current title, and is two words shorter. If that's still not precise enough, List of then-former United States presidents who ran for other office is one word shorter than the current title. Also pinging Roman Spinner, as they concurred with Paintspot. RadiculousJ (talk) 13:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per WP:CONCISE. Rreagan007 (talk) 16:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per comment by Paintspot Infez. Although the proposed main title header is shorter by three words (13 words → 10 words), the clear intent of the current header would seem to be somewhat compromised by the proposal. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 04:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support shorter, equally precise for me since it refers to former presidents running for office. (t · c) buidhe 02:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - both more accurate (they were no longer presidents when they ran, a qualification for being listed here) and more concise. Animal lover 666 (talk) 16:47, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per CONCISE. I understand Paintspot's worry, but don't see how it creates any actual problems since anyone interpreting it broadly so broadly will see how absurd it is. Also support BarrelProof's suggestion to use U.S. for United States. Even better: List of U.S. ex-presidents who ran for office. —В²C 11:52, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.