Talk:List of social networking websites

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Websites / Computing  (Rated List-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
 List  This article has been rated as List-Class on the quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (marked as Low-importance).
 

Semi-protected edit request on 4 February 2014[edit]

|- ! Poolwo | Social networking site from India | 7 January 2014 | 9,113[1] | Open | 311,170[2] |-

References
  1. ^ poolwo.com
  2. ^ poolwo.com Site Info Alexa. Retrieved 4 February 2014.

Why isin't Usenet included in this list?[edit]

It's a total crock that usenet is not included in this list. Usenet was the original "social network" on the internet, and it continues to be the only communications mechanism and method for allowing people to aggregate in "societies" and communicate with each other without corporate or government influence or censorship. Usenet is the only social network that can garantee anonymity for those that seek it.

For this wikipedia list of social networks to have even a shred of credibility, authority and completeness, Usenet must be included. The fact that this is a list of "websites" is irrelavent, because the vast majority of people do not experience any of these social networks via web-browser. This list needs to be renamed as a list of internet-based social networks, and Usenet must be added and mentioned as the original internet social network. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.91.158.197 (talk) 23:20, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

  • While I agree with you that Usenet should probably be included, please note that making statements like "total crock", "needs to be" and "must be" is not the usual, and a rarely effective, means of developing consensus on Wikipedia, which is one of the core principles by which this site works. Dwpaul Talk 23:37, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  • The list is social networking websites. Usenet is not a website. --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:26, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

It was already pointed out in this section that catagorizing social networks that exist on or are reachable through the internet in terms of whether those networks exist as websites is questionable or serves no purpose other than to exclude obvious examples of social networks such as usenet. I suggest that some action be taken to remove the unnecessary critea of "website" be removed from this article and the article be renamed as a "List of Internet-based Social Networks", and usenet be included as the defacto original internet social network. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.93.26.3 (talk) 15:05, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Social Network to be added[edit]

Can somebody add www.carii.com to this list of social networking sites? thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnpalmerjp3 (talkcontribs) 01:16, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Johnpalmerjp3 is there a Wikipedia article for this social network? Quickly looking I do not see one. The consensus here is that we only add entries after an article has been created. -- GB fan 01:28, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Doximity request[edit]

Please Add Doximity 1. It has a wikipedia article."Launched in March 2011, Doximity has over 400,000 verified physician members as of December 2015. " — Preceding unsigned comment added by BSatDrSocial (talkcontribs) 22:48, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

"http://drsocial.org, http://www.medstro.com" were also in edit summary. Origamite 22:46, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done Stickee (talk) 01:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Reminder[edit]

Social networking websites missing from the article[edit]

It appers Seen.is hasn't been listed? --62.16.186.44 (talk) 20:07, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

There are a lot of sites that haven't been listed. Seen.is does not appear to be notable. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 20:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC)