This page is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
It looks like little thought was given to the apparently random order of entries in the "Image:ReligijneSymbole.png" diagram. Because we're talking about symbols, the symbolic importance of position within the diagram may not be ignored by everyone. Some may even be offended by what they perceive to be the symbolic meaning of their religion's position in relation to another religion or in relation to some geometric feature (e.g., "highest" row, "foundational" row, "central" or peripheral). As far as I'm concerned, any order will do, but it should be explicit, i.e., order by age of the religion, alphabetical order, arrangement by geographic origin, etc. -DoctorW 15:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Something a bit un-NPOV with the descriptions of the symbols.
I seriously think it is wrong to say the Fasces is a symbol of Fascism only, and equally wrong to appropriate the dove, the torch and the rose for only a single UK party. I don't know how to mend things but that above is just horrible. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. 00:14, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Rename it if instead of a true listing of symbols this page is just gonna be a bunch of links
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus, not moved billinghurstsDrewth 03:30, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
List of symbols → List of Articles about Symbols — This page is not a list of symbols, Astrological symbols is a true list of symbols complete with the symbols themselves and an explanation of them, this page offers neither of these things. This page is just a likely incomplete catalogue of links that I don't feel like fixing up, by myself anyway, if some of you are willing to collaborate that could be a different thing, or we could just do the easier thing and move the article to a currently more descriptive name. --I′d※<3※Ɵɲɛ (talk) 22:06, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Oppose a many of the list articles are of this format. You could always expand the article to make it a detailed list instead of a bare list 126.96.36.199 (talk) 06:49, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Oppose not the usual format of pages JDDJS (talk) 18:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.