This article is part of WikiProject Norway, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Norway. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can register your interest for the project and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
I think the In popular culture section at Lofoten is out of proportion. Quote from WP:IPC:
This page in a nutshell: "In popular culture" sections should be carefully maintained and contain sourced examples demonstrating a subject's cultural significance. Per Wikipedia's summary style, when sections grow excessively long they can be split into subarticles, but this should be done with caution.
I don't think Lofotens cultural significance is demonstrated by a 2000 Canadian movie that is not particularly famous. I removed the section, then User:Mebden put it back. I would like to have other peoples opinions on whether it should be here in this case. Is this really notable? Do many people, many Canadians, only know about Lofoten because of this movie? Has the movie influenced tourism or other visits to Lofoten, is the movie set in Lofoten or is it just passing? Is Lofoten very important to the plot of the movie? Is the movie well-known? Are there any secondary sources addressing the issues I raies here? I still think it should be removed. --GerritCUTEDH 12:10, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Interesting questions. My answers are: yes, yes, can't say, yes, yes, yes, yes, and not sure. Some of your questions are more important than others. I recommend we stick to the WP:IPC text itself.
The requirements stated therein seem to be met by the proposed IPC section at Lofoten. The page also suggests that "one helpful test can be to look at whether a person who is familiar with the topic only through the reference in question has the potential to learn something meaningful about the topic from that work alone." The work in question -- possibly the only film named after Lofoten's famous phenomenon -- contains footage of the archipelago, including (among other things) a scene shot from a moving boat that highlights the excitement elicited by the water around the islands. The Lofoten footage, and particularly its relationship with the rest of the film, demonstrate (inter alia) the "subject's cultural significance". Mebden (talk) 13:42, 27 March 2010 (UTC)