Talk:London Convention (1884)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Merge issue[edit]

Following from discussion on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Xdamr#Pretoria_and_London_Conventions and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Paul_Hjul#Pretoria.2FLondon_Conventions

While I can see your position for retention of the two articles as seperate articles (we've discussed this on our talk pages) for now it seems best to me at least for the merge tag to be left - the orphaned tag can go - because we are constructing some stuff on it.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Hjul (talk • contribs)

Sorry, I didn't intend to remove the merge tag, only to undo the merge by User:Marcsin - a move which in my view was rather precipitate. I'll try to expand the two pages Pretoria and London Conventions over the next couple of days, then we can decide their future.

Xdamr^talk 14:41, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought as much. Thanks. On that point I've fixed the link from the Pretoria Convention

Paul Hjul 08:02, 6 November 2006 (UTC) (I really need to get in the habit of signing :([reply]

Suzerainty[edit]

The idea that British suzerainty was relinquished seems to be contradicted by Article I paragraph 4: The South African Republic will conclude no treaty or engagement with any state or nation other than The OFS … until the same is approved by HM the Queen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.27.172.154 (talk) 13:28, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]