Talk:Lord Randolph Churchill
| WikiProject University of Oxford | (Rated Start-class) | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom | (Rated Start-class) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| WikiProject Biography / Politics and Government | (Rated Start-class) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Contents |
[edit] Death
I've added the possiblity of Lord Churchill dying of a brain tumor. The Churchill Center website offers a plausible analysis that strongly suggests he died of a brain tumor, though, one could suggest they may have a bias in favor of an alternate diagnosis. This can be found here: http://www.winstonchurchill.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=105
That's the Mather article, isn't it? Yes. I've read about this, too. I think the entry is somewhat coloured by the diagnosis of the specialist in charge of Lord Randolph; he did indeed diagnose syphilis. However, Lord Randolph's wife never contracted the disease - despite it being, apparently, highly contagious. Richard Holmes advances the theory that he died of some other cause, probably a left brain tumour, in "In the Footsteps of Churchill", p.32.
I have deleted the reference to Holmes's opinion that if LRC had had tertiary syphilis, he must surely have passed it to his wife and thence to their children. Latent syphilis is not contagious: see for example http://www.merck.com/mmpe/sec14/ch194/ch194i.html Davidiank (talk) 22:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
I hardly think the cited article "explodes" the idea that Lord Randolph had syphilis. The article states " The dramatic deterioration in his health and the various descriptions of his behavior in his last three years might support a diagnosis of dementia paralytica in late or tertiary syphilis, which affects the brain and appears ten to twenty years after the primary infection. This would likely have affected Jennie and their two sons, Winston and Jack. But if a diagnosis of advanced syphilis is to be accepted, there must have been an initial infection."
The transmission of syphilis is complex, and it is also quite likely that Lord Randolph contracted it after Winston's birth (that is Robert Massey's belief, IIRC). Additionally, it is highly unlikely that Jack Churchill was Lord Randolph's son. It seems to me that the key thing is that in order for LR to have had syphilis, he would have had to contract it, and that this is unthinkable. In fact, it is not. Both LR and Jennie were quite active outside their marriage, sexually speaking, and this is pretty well acknowledged by everyone not trying to whitewash Lord Randolph's reputation. ~~
[edit] Winston premature?
- How could he have married her in June if his son was born in November of that year? I read somewhere else that he wedded Miss Jerome in April. Still, that suggests that Sir Winston was, sir-reverence, illegitimately conceived. Anglius
- Pre-marital conception was not uncommon in those days, though I believe the official version is something like destiny could not wait! Timrollpickering 20:42, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
- I disagree, Mr. Pickering, for the vast majority of Victorians were moral, but I appreciate your reply. However, please do not make a vulgar jest. --Anglius 20:57, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
I believe that he married in April. Here's the ODNB, from its article on Randolph:
- Randolph and Jennie [see Churchill, Jeanette] were married at the British embassy in Paris on 15 April 1874, and their first child, Winston Churchill (the future prime minister), was born prematurely at Blenheim Palace on 30 November 1874. Their younger child, John (Jack), was born in February 1880.
The article on Winston goes into somewhat more detail.
- Jennie and Lord Randolph were married at the British embassy in Paris on 15 April 1874. Winston Churchill's date of birth has given rise to speculation that he was conceived before the wedding, but the only certainty is that he was born prematurely. Preparations were made for the birth to take place in London, but after slipping and falling during a visit to Blenheim Jennie went into labour, the local doctor was summoned, and the baby was delivered at 1.30 a.m. on 30 November.
7.5 months is at least plausible, especially if the birth was clearly premature, as it seems to be. john k 22:42, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
- From recollection various Winston biographies are in disagreement on this. Jenkins (the only one on my shelf at the moment) goes for premature but doesn't delve into this (instead giving space to the question of Jack Churchill's paternity) whilst My Early Life ignores this completely. I think Pelling and/or Ponting goes to pre-marital conception and also argues that the Churchill family hid the real cause of Randolph's illness and death for decades. Timrollpickering 23:41, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
- I thank you for your information, Mr. Pickering and Mr. Kenney.Anglius 00:18, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Without comment
His widow, Lady Randolph Churchill, married George Cornwallis-West in 1900, yet retained her noble prerogative earned through her marriage to Lord Randolph.In addition,in his 1995 book "Bloody Red Baron" novelist Kim Newman described Randolph's son,later prime-minister Winston Churchill as a vampire, personally devoted to sucking a blood of previously whiskey-drunked rabbits.This surprisingly reminds of sir Winston's most famous personal habbits. 213.240.6.72 19:24, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Homeschooling
I took out the link to homeschooling, since Churchill was evidently not "homeschooled" but rather educated privately. There's a bit of a difference. When you're homeschooled your parents or their associates teach you (as you can see); when you're privately educated at Blenheim your father, the Duke, brings in the best private tutors available. Sort of a different tradition. 99.231.111.157 (talk) 17:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Jack the Ripper
What! No mention of this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.183.214 (talk) 04:27, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Article rename
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people) states that titles "are not generally used to begin the titles of biographical articles, unless they are used to form the unambiguous name by which the subject is clearly best known". Not being British myself and thus unfamiliar with the man, are we asserting that Churchill is best known as "Lord Randolph Churchill"? If not, then this article probably should be moved to "Randolph Henry Churchill" or "Randolph Churchill (1849–1895)". howcheng {chat} 17:06, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- Start-Class University of Oxford articles
- Unknown-importance University of Oxford articles
- Automatically assessed University of Oxford articles
- WikiProject University of Oxford articles
- Start-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Unknown-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles