Talk:Lou Henry Hoover House

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Plagiarized article[edit]

The "NPS" tag in the article suggests someone was proud that the article incorporated text from a National Park Service website. However, based on how that tag is associated with plagiarism in other articles, this is a clear indication that the article is plagiarized. I suppose if it is plagiarized, it is better to acknowledge that than not. The article is now a mess, a mixture of plagiarized text and newly written text. I am inclined to blank it out and start over, although that could lose some newly written text. I marked it with "refimprove" tag for the moment, may return to blank it all out. doncram (talk) 20:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also downrated the article to Stub as it is apparently plagiarized. doncram (talk) 20:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

site associated with Stanford accounting scandal?[edit]

This house may be associated with an accounting scandal involving Stanford's use of Federal grant monies. Cedar lining for closets and flowers for the president's home were paid for via overhead charges to grant funds that was found to be technically inappropriate. One news article relating to that is "Stanford to Alter Its Accounting Of Overhead on Research Grants" by ANTHONY DEPALMA Published: July 23, 1991 New York Times article. Was this house the university president Kennedy's home at the time? doncram (talk) 20:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is the name correct?[edit]

I've only ever seen the house referred to as the Lou Henry Hoover House in campus documentation not as the Lou Henry and Herbert Hoover House so which is correct? --Erp (talk) 03:44, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lou Henry Hoover House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:09, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]