Talk:Louis Vuitton

Archives (Index)

2013 2015 2017 2018 2020

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Pronunciation

The spelling and pronunciation have no correlation. Shouldn't it be [lou-is vu-it-on]. The french seem to be crazy? But I dont want to disrupt the page. 210.212.162.179 (talk) 10:21, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Au contraire, mon ami, les francais sont pas crazy, they dont question the pronounciation or spelling of somebody's name!! Americans now, they are crazy, I mean, look at their gun laws!! - Roxy the grumpy dog. wooF 19:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Controversy section - failing WP:DUE and WP:NOTNEWS

The current controversy section would seem to violate quite a number of policies. It mainly consists of rather detailed descriptions of perfectly trivial events without any relevance, most of which are very recent. Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS, and the tendency for some users (certainly acting in good faith) to add any minor aspect found in the press is fails both not news and WP:DUE. If something is not relevant in ten years, it's not relevant for an 'encyclopaedia today either. Reading the very long controversy section, I struggle to find any real controversy, meaning anything that would go beyond having been mentioned in the news a couple of times and quickly forgotten. Again, the idea here is not to mention every time a company (especially not a major one) is featured in media. Jeppiz (talk) 23:21, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

MUN collaboration

Hey, I'm from mun team . Our team wants to collaborate with you. If you are interested so I'm waiting for your positive response. Thanks Regards Mun team . 202.5.142.139 (talk) 18:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

What is Mun team? - Roxy the grumpy dog. wooF 19:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Nazi collaboration section

There seems to be a mix-up with the sections "History" and "Nazi collaboration", the second one should be under the "History" section and parts 2.1, 2.2 and 2,3 as well.— Preceding unsigned comment added by -nickyssa (talk • contribs) 08:38, June 23, 2022 (UTC)

 Done Changed to a level 3 heading. Z1720 (talk) 14:09, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Brand ranking error

Under "Brand and Intellectual Property," it says that a study showed LV to be the 19th most valuable brand in the world. However, the study says on page 9 that it was the 29th. 2601:40A:8300:1010:3C92:3402:A841:C25E (talk) 00:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 July 2023

The pattern is not based on Japanese "mon", but a Pipa given to Japan by the Chinese emperor. Source:https://www.narahaku.go.jp/english/http://home.kpn.nl/ooije006/sashimisen/things_japanese/biwa_p.html

https://shosoin.kunaicho.go.jp/en-US/treasures?id=0000014804&index=5

https://www.jstor.org/stable/833840?seq=1

https://www.lcsd.gov.hk/en/mo/common/doc/RETMJP.pdf

https://www.yoogiscloset.com/louis-vuitton/guide

https://hk.asiatatler.com/life/louis-vuitton-tokyo-exhibition-volez-voguez-voyagez

https://www.ft.com/content/bebc244c-0324-11e6-af1d-c47326021344

https://forums.littletinyfrogs.com/399537/louis-vuitton-history BYDaicing (talk) 10:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.  Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The only source I could review and would accept as reliable is Tatler Asia, and it isn't clear that it supports your argument. Please specify exactly what you want to change, and back it up with sources that say that exact thing. Thanks, Xan747 (talk) 01:03, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 August 2023

Under 'Products', correct Moyene Modele] to Moyene Modele, Anemoiia (talk) 12:34, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

 Done — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:18, 19 August 2023 (UTC)