Talk:Louise Markus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hillsong church[edit]

The Hillsong Church article contains two paragraphs that seem more appropriate here. They are:

Subsequent to the election accusations were made in the NSW State Parliament that Mrs Markus's campaign had inappropriately placed undue emphasis on the Muslim background of her chief opponent.

and

The candidates for both the [[Christian Democratic Party (Australia)|Christian Democrat and Family First parties in Greenway recorded lower percentages of votes than their parties' candidates in comparable seats.

Should they be moved? Are they accurate? --Scott Davis Talk 09:56, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 23:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Major edit. References finally added[edit]

I've reverted a previous edit, which deleted the 2004 Muslim controversy entry, in the mistaken belief it was a reference to the 2007 Muslim controvery in Lindsay. The section could probably handle a re-write and maybe some more references. It was a big deal at the time. She won by 900 odd votes, and there was a lot of christian/muslim crap going on at the time. Her religion and ties to the Hillsong church were, and are, actively promoted. And the religion of her opponent (a non-practising muslim) was referenced in this context. In the light of what happened in Lindsay, it seems that the 2004 Greenway pamphlets could have been dirty tricks by the Liberals to influence the election result.

I've got references for most of what's here. There are no references for her studies or prior career, or her family. Not sure what would be good sources for these. 58.107.72.85 (talk) 03:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason, the page was reverted to a previous state. For the love of GOB, if there's a problem, discuss it! I can't see how /all/ the edits and references were bad. Perhaps, any iffy bits could be editted, and the good bits left. 58.107.72.85 (talk) 11:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Louise Markus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:50, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]