Talk:Love over Gold

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Rock music

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Love over Gold as Progressive Rock[edit]

I think the genre should be changed to "Progressive Rock", since it was their attempt, and mostly an accomplished task nihil 01:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will go along, since Prog incorporates Rock in the wikischeme of things. Being primarily a Prog fan means that I like this album better than the jazzier or more rockin' sounds of the earlier and later albums respectively. --Fantailfan 20:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Digital display[edit]

What is the software producing the digital display on the back of the sleeve - some sort of music editing program? Drutt (talk) 01:09, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:13, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Love over Gold → Love Over Gold – The correct presentation of the title includes a capital "O", as shown in numerous sources, including AllMusic, Rolling Stone, the CD label, the artist's website, etc. This request is consistent with MOS:CT. Bede735 (talk) 13:02, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support, ~~straightforward case, to the extent that this could be filed as a technical request~~. --78.35.235.104 (talk) 13:39, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, I still morally support this move, but according to MOS:CT, "over" (as a prepositions containing four letters or fewer) should not be capitalized. Seems kind of awkward to me, especially considering similar cases like "From dusk till dawn", yet this has support. --87.79.208.25 (talk) 05:41, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per MOS:CAPS. Powers ^T 20:20, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, what is the difference between the "over" in this title and e.g. in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest? Should all those titles be moved to lowercase "over" as well? --213.168.117.64 (talk) 08:01, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, according to our manual of style. Powers ^T 14:50, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the requested move discussion at Talk:Bridge over Troubled Water. —BarrelProof (talk) 06:30, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please link this discussion to the identical proposal at Talk:Bridge over Troubled Water, per the guidelines. There is no point having the same discussion in two different places. Skinsmoke (talk) 02:12, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per MOS:CAPS. Other sources capitalize or not according to their own style guidelines. We should follow Wikipedia's guidelines and keep the preposition lowercase.--ShelfSkewed Talk 16:34, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Love over Gold. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.chartstats.com/albuminfo.php?id=6116
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604040853/http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx to http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Progressive Rock[edit]

I'm sorry, buddy, but this album is very far from progressive rock. Mark Knopfler does not have a progressive mind and a progressive style. Long tracks are not enough indication to have progressive rock. Please change the genre indicating only "rock". Do you think in 1981 a progressive rock record could had rankings like this, in every chart? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.16.193.51 (talk) 13:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]