Talk:Lucky imaging

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Comparison images[edit]

I don't know where this could be found, but if anyone is able to hunt them down, some comparisons of resolution with ordinary exposure and resolution with the lucky imaging technique would be educational in showing the improvement possible. -Kasreyn 21:27, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, indeeed, the article now contains a series showing 100%/50% down to 1% of the images chosen, however people will likely wonder how a single exposure looks like, and maybe also how 50 look compared to 500. maybe best would be a good one that is in the 1% and a bad one that gets discarded quickly... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.155.83.52 (talk) 20:30, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

The article is missing an explanation of how the best images are chosen - there must be some criteria, but none is even hinted at. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.238.149.103 (talk) 09:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)


All suggestions mentioned above have been added to the article. Ecodeluz. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecodeluz (talkcontribs) 12:54, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Ghost objects[edit]

The 50% and 10% demonstration images appear to contain two barely visible objects to the right of the brightest object. Presumably these arise because of wrongly shifted images (where the objects on the left were shifted to the center)? Might be nice if someone more knowledgeable could add a note about this to the article. 217.121.224.124 (talk) 20:24, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

How are the "best" images selected?[edit]

From this article, it's not immediately clear how the "best" images from a large set of exposures are selected. Can anyone add some information? Papa November (talk) 14:14, 29 October 2014 (UTC)