Talk:Lurker (Dungeons & Dragons)

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters

This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus (talk · contribs) on 21 December 2019.

Dungeons & Dragons

This redirect is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Split trapper to separate article?[edit]

Surely trapper should be a separate article - why is it mentioned here (despite similarity)? I've had to link to this page for trapper info a couple of times now, so surely if we can flesh the info out a little it would be enough to have its own article. Any reason why this can't happen? ahpla 10:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind if you create a trapper article, but try and add as much info to it as possible at the start or people may try and merge it back here. Ideally, some of the info would be from other than the sourcebooks, although this can be hard to find. Check out Satyr to see an article that someone wanted to get rid of and I stopped them by adding Notes. - Peregrine Fisher 17:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just added the split article suggestion tag to see if anyone else has an opinion on this. Why do you think the background information should come from more than one source? Surely the AD&D monster manual is the birth certificate of each monster? Besides, if you add information from other sources, how can it be verified? ahpla 15:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]