Talk:Luther Cressman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Oregon (Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
The current collaborations of the month are Cover Oregon & Heathman Hotel.
WikiProject Anthropology (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
 
WikiProject Biography (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 

"Useless" template[edit]

I'm not sure if the removal of the template is a case of WP:POINT, though deeming it useless is rather uncivil. The {{nofootnotes}} template has a legitimate usage. Though the article is quite short, there is a list of references almost as long. If these aren't actually being used to back up facts in the article per WP:CITE, they should probably be moved to a "Further reading" section. Citing each fact in the article with in-text citations now will also make it easier when the article is added to by future editors. I'd like to hear why the template is useless. Latr, Katr 17:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)