Talk:Lutheran Confessional Synod

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lutheran Confessional Synod. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am the pro-siding elder of the church stop reverting the answers Johnhus2019 (talk) 01:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the synod reorganized[edit]

Because the fact that losing a conservative confessional Lutheran church Is something needed to be prevented the former bishop and his two co pastors Decided to abandon the confessional. Lutheran faith for other expressions of the Christian faith that is up to them I made it my mission to save and restore the church so that no more Right believing conservative confessional Lutheran churches defunct

Also their are rumors of bad behavior on the part of Bishop dejaynes 

And a criminal reports naming him a registered sex offender Johnhus2019 (talk) 04:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We are not sure if bishop dejaynes is still registered we.must give him all benefit of proving he is innocent of the charges Johnhus2019 (talk) 01:24, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Proposal[edit]

I've taken the liberty of removing the deletion template for the time being. The article clearly isn't up to snuff at the moment, but I think it may be possible to improve it. There are a few websites that have a bit of information on the LCS, but more importantly, it appears to be discussed in WELS and other Lutherans, and it may be included in Melton's Encyclopedia of American Religions. I'll try to take a look at those at some point in the near future.

Honestly, I think most of the American Lutheran microsynods don't necessarily need their own page, but I'm not sure how you'd combine them. A single page with brief descriptions of all the Lutheran denominations in the US would be a monstrosity, and I can't think of any way to split them up. If anyone has any ideas, I'd be very interested in hearing them. Bnng (talk) 22:59, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bnng: - do you know how much is in that source? I couldn't see how much. The other websites I saw all failed some ground or another to be a notability-providing one, so I felt the lack of multiple sources was enough, but it'd be great to know what it contained since it might point us elsewhere. If Melton's also has it then that would be great - let me know if you get a chance to see them.
I had exactly the same view regarding merging - it seems such an obvious merge source, but a) it would still need a reference b) I feel merging lots of little denominations would be unpleasant and unwise, as you noted. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:30, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Nosebagbear:, I don't know what's all in that source, but there's a library near me that has a copy, so I'm going to try to get there sometime next week to take a look. I'll take a look at Melton's sometime this week or next as well. Bnng (talk) 22:29, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The former bishop of this church cited in the article is currently on the Illinois state records as a sexual predator and feel Wikipedia promoting this article is promoting something that we should not I ask it be deleted Johnhus1866 (talk) 01:24, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]